<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>JTA&#8217;s 100 Most Influential Jewish Twitterers</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/jtas-100-most-influential-jewish-twitterers/</link>
    <description>JTA determines which Jewish bloggers, institutions and other entities have successfully staked their claim in Twitter realty.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>asoclof@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-05-01T;16:42:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Elizabeth Greene</title>
      <link>jewtruth@care2.com</link>
      <description>Do you mean this Sammy Benoit?

http://cyberpathlinks.blogspot.com/2007/06/j&#45;aka&#45;gridney&#45;aka&#45;yidwithlid&#45;aka&#45;sammy.html


Mrs. Dr. Robert Greene</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean this Sammy Benoit?
<br />
<a href="http://cyberpathlinks.blogspot.com/2007/06/j-aka-gridney-aka-yidwithlid-aka-sammy.html">http://cyberpathlinks.blogspot.com/2007/06/j-aka-gridney-aka-yidwithlid-aka-sammy.html</a>
</p>
<p>
Mrs. Dr. Robert Greene
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Eric Elkins</title>
      <link>eric@widefoc.us</link>
      <description>Jeff,


There are a number of Twitter analyzers out there, but I haven&#8217;t seen consistent results from any of them. We measure influence using a number of indicators, and, so far at least, I&#8217;ve found that we capture nuances that an automated system just can&#8217;t. 


I&#8217;m not convinced that a multi&#45;faceted approach was really used here. Or, at least, used well.


Still, it&#8217;s good to see friends and colleagues on the list. I&#8217;m a twitterer who&#8217;s Jewish, which is very different from a Jewish twitterer!


Hope that helps!

Eric</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff,
</p>
<p>
There are a number of Twitter analyzers out there, but I haven&#8217;t seen consistent results from any of them. We measure influence using a number of indicators, and, so far at least, I&#8217;ve found that we capture nuances that an automated system just can&#8217;t. 
</p>
<p>
I&#8217;m not convinced that a multi-faceted approach was really used here. Or, at least, used well.
</p>
<p>
Still, it&#8217;s good to see friends and colleagues on the list. I&#8217;m a twitterer who&#8217;s Jewish, which is very different from a Jewish twitterer!
</p>
<p>
Hope that helps!
<br />
Eric
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Mottel</title>
      <link>mordechai7215@gmail.com</link>
      <description>My thoughts on the list:

http://mordechai7215.blogspot.com/2009/05/jta&#45;fail&#45;whale&#45;of&#45;twitter&#45;list.html</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My thoughts on the list:
<br />
<a href="http://mordechai7215.blogspot.com/2009/05/jta-fail-whale-of-twitter-list.html">http://mordechai7215.blogspot.com/2009/05/jta-fail-whale-of-twitter-list.html</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Eric Haber</title>
      <link>erichaber@gmail.com</link>
      <description>I thought I&#8217;d give a quick tip.&amp;nbsp; I follow a lot of people for work and pleasure but in this case I created a second twitter account for just for this list, but adding one person at a time just a little slow. Try (seesmic) to manage two twitter accounts. Here&#8217;s an option to add all (top 50) at once.&amp;nbsp; hope this helps


Enjoy, ericfl2


1st. go to http://www.twitterator.org/

2nd. use this list to add them all to your chosen account.

ahoova

jewlicious

buberzionist

ylove

kvetchingeditor

daroff

hadassah_levy

jerusalembureau

alizahausman

EstherK

nanachtoronto

JemPolitico

yeahthatskosher

hebrewzzi

yidwithlid

dejerusalem

susqhb

popjudaica

tova_s

mobius1ski

miriamschwab

diwon

KosherWineGuy

ModernTribe_Jew

ainav

weinberg81

Shapiro

mayanorton

shaister

frumsatire

louismgreen

Rabbi

arielbeery

thebigfelafel

jewssip

teruah

jewnet

bizmonides

Joann_Betschart

israellycool

Herring

JewishArtMuseum

MGoldenberg

miriam_woelke

eshanken

israelsituation

aharonhorwitz

JoshuaRubin

sugarblum

RuthieWa</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I&#8217;d give a quick tip.&nbsp; I follow a lot of people for work and pleasure but in this case I created a second twitter account for just for this list, but adding one person at a time just a little slow. Try (seesmic) to manage two twitter accounts. Here&#8217;s an option to add all (top 50) at once.&nbsp; hope this helps
</p>
<p>
Enjoy, ericfl2
</p>
<p>
1st. go to <a href="http://www.twitterator.org/">http://www.twitterator.org/</a>
<br />
2nd. use this list to add them all to your chosen account.
<br />
ahoova
<br />
jewlicious
<br />
buberzionist
<br />
ylove
<br />
kvetchingeditor
<br />
daroff
<br />
hadassah_levy
<br />
jerusalembureau
<br />
alizahausman
<br />
EstherK
<br />
nanachtoronto
<br />
JemPolitico
<br />
yeahthatskosher
<br />
hebrewzzi
<br />
yidwithlid
<br />
dejerusalem
<br />
susqhb
<br />
popjudaica
<br />
tova_s
<br />
mobius1ski
<br />
miriamschwab
<br />
diwon
<br />
KosherWineGuy
<br />
ModernTribe_Jew
<br />
ainav
<br />
weinberg81
<br />
Shapiro
<br />
mayanorton
<br />
shaister
<br />
frumsatire
<br />
louismgreen
<br />
Rabbi
<br />
arielbeery
<br />
thebigfelafel
<br />
jewssip
<br />
teruah
<br />
jewnet
<br />
bizmonides
<br />
Joann_Betschart
<br />
israellycool
<br />
Herring
<br />
JewishArtMuseum
<br />
MGoldenberg
<br />
miriam_woelke
<br />
eshanken
<br />
israelsituation
<br />
aharonhorwitz
<br />
JoshuaRubin
<br />
sugarblum
<br />
RuthieWa
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jeff Katz</title>
      <link>jeff@galitconsulting.com</link>
      <description>Eric &#45; I agree with your premise that the ratio of friends to followers is not a good or complete indicator, but if you look at the top 10 &#45;15 mentioned, most of them have a pretty good follower:follower ratio.&amp;nbsp;  Like all of us reading this blog, I can think of a number of people who should have been on this list @jeffpulver and @ezrabutler come to mind for me.


You are spot on in saying that &#8220;Twitter isn’t just a broadcasting channel, it’s also a conversational tool&#8221;  Obviously that is really dependent on who is using it.&amp;nbsp; For some, like @BreakingNews or @inwnews they use it solely as a broadcast channel while many use it primarily as conversation tool like @techaviv


On the subject of Twitalyzer &#45; I am curious why the &#8220;Really?&#8221;  


Jeff (@katzpdx)</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric - I agree with your premise that the ratio of friends to followers is not a good or complete indicator, but if you look at the top 10 -15 mentioned, most of them have a pretty good follower:follower ratio.&nbsp;  Like all of us reading this blog, I can think of a number of people who should have been on this list @jeffpulver and @ezrabutler come to mind for me.
</p>
<p>
You are spot on in saying that &#8220;Twitter isn’t just a broadcasting channel, it’s also a conversational tool&#8221;  Obviously that is really dependent on who is using it.&nbsp; For some, like @BreakingNews or @inwnews they use it solely as a broadcast channel while many use it primarily as conversation tool like @techaviv
</p>
<p>
On the subject of Twitalyzer - I am curious why the &#8220;Really?&#8221;  
</p>
<p>
Jeff (@katzpdx)
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Gus Erlichman</title>
      <link>erlichman@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Thanks JTA for this good surprise! We&#8217; re very happy with this ranking!!!


Gus Erlichman

PLETZ.com</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks JTA for this good surprise! We&#8217; re very happy with this ranking!!!
</p>
<p>
Gus Erlichman
<br />
PLETZ.com
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Eric Elkins</title>
      <link>eric@widefoc.us</link>
      <description>I think it&#8217;s admirable that you&#8217;re recognizing Jewish twitterers, but your decision to rank them, and the criteria you used show a very primitive understanding of how Twitter works, and what its role is.


For instance, your belief that the ratio of friends to followers holds any true meaning is flawed. The most influential twitterers (barring celebs who are helping the network jump the shark) tend to follow pretty much the same number of people who are following them. That&#8217;s because Twitter isn&#8217;t just a broadcasting channel, it&#8217;s also a conversational tool. If you, as an influential, aware Twitter user aren&#8217;t following other relevant conversations, and weighing in on them, then you&#8217;re not building an truly affiliated audience. 


And, seriously, you used Twitalyzer? Really?


Well, it was a nice effort, I suppose.


Shabbat shalom.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s admirable that you&#8217;re recognizing Jewish twitterers, but your decision to rank them, and the criteria you used show a very primitive understanding of how Twitter works, and what its role is.
</p>
<p>
For instance, your belief that the ratio of friends to followers holds any true meaning is flawed. The most influential twitterers (barring celebs who are helping the network jump the shark) tend to follow pretty much the same number of people who are following them. That&#8217;s because Twitter isn&#8217;t just a broadcasting channel, it&#8217;s also a conversational tool. If you, as an influential, aware Twitter user aren&#8217;t following other relevant conversations, and weighing in on them, then you&#8217;re not building an truly affiliated audience. 
</p>
<p>
And, seriously, you used Twitalyzer? Really?
</p>
<p>
Well, it was a nice effort, I suppose.
</p>
<p>
Shabbat shalom.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jaqueline S.</title>
      <link>jaquecavalieri@yahoo.com.br</link>
      <description>The ranking idea is very good. But I did not understood the criteria of some names (individual ranking) because it was not give explanation why they were there. When i saw their twitter page, some i can say that i agree with some choices, only some. Why a woman with 60 followers was choosen?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ranking idea is very good. But I did not understood the criteria of some names (individual ranking) because it was not give explanation why they were there. When i saw their twitter page, some i can say that i agree with some choices, only some. Why a woman with 60 followers was choosen?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Alan Jay Weisbard</title>
      <link>alan.weisbard@gmail.com</link>
      <description>As regular readers of these comments will appreciate, my credo is never to address a matter worthy of discussion in 140 characters when 5000 will do. No twitter for me. I prefer my conversations to be fully baked.

&#45;&#45;The Wise Bard</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As regular readers of these comments will appreciate, my credo is never to address a matter worthy of discussion in 140 characters when 5000 will do. No twitter for me. I prefer my conversations to be fully baked.
<br />
--The Wise Bard
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Susanne</title>
      <link>susqhb@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Also for your consideration, @ParnasaFest for job opportunities. All three of its national chairs, @yeahthatskosher (#13), @weinberg81 (#26), and myself, @susqhb (#17) are listed in your top 50 Most Influential Jewish Twitterers. Check out our site: http://www.parnasafest.org</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also for your consideration, @ParnasaFest for job opportunities. All three of its national chairs, @yeahthatskosher (#13), @weinberg81 (#26), and myself, @susqhb (#17) are listed in your top 50 Most Influential Jewish Twitterers. Check out our site: <a href="http://www.parnasafest.org">http://www.parnasafest.org</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Rob Festenstein</title>
      <link>rob@adath&#45;israel.org</link>
      <description>This is an excellent article. I was just disappointed to see that you had not listed more congregations like Adath Israel in Cincinnati, who have started up very active presences on Twitter. Here is a link to follow us:http://twitter.com/adathisrael 

Even William Daroff follows us!


Shabbat Shalom,

Rob Festenstein</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent article. I was just disappointed to see that you had not listed more congregations like Adath Israel in Cincinnati, who have started up very active presences on Twitter. Here is a link to follow us:http://twitter.com/adathisrael 
<br />
Even William Daroff follows us!
</p>
<p>
Shabbat Shalom,
<br />
Rob Festenstein
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-24T;14:04:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
