<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>About that email</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/about-that-email/</link>
    <description>I will be the first to admit that Friday&#8217;s fundraising letter was ill&#45;advised and regrettable.&amp;nbsp; The characterization of bloggers and Twitterers as &#8220;non&#45;professional&#8221; and unreliable was not only counterproductive but arguably false.&amp;nbsp;</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>dsieradski@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-04-05T;17:14:01-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jewlicious</title>
      <link>jewlicious@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Benefits? You get to help save the JTA!! Isn&#8217;t that enough?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benefits? You get to help save the JTA!! Isn&#8217;t that enough?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-19T;22:58:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by IsraDan</title>
      <link>jphilanthropy@yahoo.com</link>
      <description>Dan,


I appreciate your response to what has been said over the past few days on the blog&#45;o&#45;sphere. But, I am also quite disappointed that it came from you (regardless of your position in the JTA). The feelings that Elisa&#8217;s solicitation email brought forth deserve a formal response from her, as both the author of the email and President of JTA.


On a related note, and lost in all the various comments is that the solicitation email asks us &#8220;to join JTA by becoming a member of our online community. For just $50...&#8221;


Membership implies certain benefits not available to non&#45;members. What exactly are the benefits of JTA membership?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan,
</p>
<p>
I appreciate your response to what has been said over the past few days on the blog-o-sphere. But, I am also quite disappointed that it came from you (regardless of your position in the JTA). The feelings that Elisa&#8217;s solicitation email brought forth deserve a formal response from her, as both the author of the email and President of JTA.
</p>
<p>
On a related note, and lost in all the various comments is that the solicitation email asks us &#8220;to join JTA by becoming a member of our online community. For just $50...&#8221;
</p>
<p>
Membership implies certain benefits not available to non-members. What exactly are the benefits of JTA membership?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-19T;22:58:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jewlicious</title>
      <link>jewlicious@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Golly. I think most of the bloggers you cited offered reasoned responses to the JTA&#8217;s poorly thought out fundraising pitch &#45; a couple of us, myself included, even provided readers with a link to the JTA&#8217;s membership solicitation page. I would hardly call the bulk of these responses &#8220;hyperventilation.&#8221; In fact, they were better thought out than the the JTA&#8217;s original pitch letter. I don&#8217;t think anyone suggested that traditional media ought to be replaced by blog posts and tweets! 


The first part of your post was fine &#45; the fundraising letter was indeed ill&#45;advised and regrettable. The second part responded to an argument that no one was making. I don&#8217;t think any of us wants the JTA to fold! Also, not all of us are aspiring journalists looking, &#8220;pleading&#8221; for writing gigs. Some of us do what we do because we are passionate about the state of the Jewish people and blogs allow us to have a say in its direction &#45; blogs give us a voice in an arena where we never had one before. I mean seriously, if you ever see my name under an article about some dude&#8217;s restaurant&#8217;s Passover menu, please shoot me. I don&#8217;t have any problem with those that choose to write that sort of stuff for a living, it&#8217;s just not for me.


In any case, I wish the JTA the best of luck in its fundraising campaign. The JTA is undoubtedly a very important Jewish community organization that ought to be supported, but please, not at my expense ok?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Golly. I think most of the bloggers you cited offered reasoned responses to the JTA&#8217;s poorly thought out fundraising pitch - a couple of us, myself included, even provided readers with a link to the JTA&#8217;s membership solicitation page. I would hardly call the bulk of these responses &#8220;hyperventilation.&#8221; In fact, they were better thought out than the the JTA&#8217;s original pitch letter. I don&#8217;t think anyone suggested that traditional media ought to be replaced by blog posts and tweets! 
</p>
<p>
The first part of your post was fine - the fundraising letter was indeed ill-advised and regrettable. The second part responded to an argument that no one was making. I don&#8217;t think any of us wants the JTA to fold! Also, not all of us are aspiring journalists looking, &#8220;pleading&#8221; for writing gigs. Some of us do what we do because we are passionate about the state of the Jewish people and blogs allow us to have a say in its direction - blogs give us a voice in an arena where we never had one before. I mean seriously, if you ever see my name under an article about some dude&#8217;s restaurant&#8217;s Passover menu, please shoot me. I don&#8217;t have any problem with those that choose to write that sort of stuff for a living, it&#8217;s just not for me.
</p>
<p>
In any case, I wish the JTA the best of luck in its fundraising campaign. The JTA is undoubtedly a very important Jewish community organization that ought to be supported, but please, not at my expense ok?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-19T;22:58:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>