The Telegraph: From the desk of JTA managing editor Ami Eden

Archive for the ‘Israel’ Category

Iran on my mind

Friday
Jul 18,2008
  • Israeli historian Benny Morris games out an Israeli attack on Iran and its aftermath, which might include nuclear exchanges between Israel and Iran, in an Op-Ed piece in Friday’s New York Times: “Should Israel’s conventional assault fail to significantly harm or stall the Iranian program, a ratcheting up of the Iranian-Israeli conflict to a nuclear level will most likely follow.”
  • The University of Chicago’s Raja Kamel offers her argument against a U.S. attack on Iran in a column in the Chicago Tribune. She says an attack would prompt sharply increased Iranian hostility toward the U.S., a ratcheting up of Iranian-sponsored extremist activity in Iraq, restriction of oil flow in the Strait of Hormuz and another war between Israel and Iran’s proxy militia in Lebanon, Hezbollah.
  • Actually, that doesn’t sound so bad, all things considered. Compared with Morris, Kamel seems downright upbeat.

  • Israeli Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz, the Israeli government point person for talks with the U.S. on Iran, sits down with the Jerusalem Post and again warns that Israel ultimately may have to resort to a military strike against Iran’s suspected nuclear weapons facilities.
  • The Post report also bizarrely says Mofaz “stands a good chance of becoming prime minister shortly after September’s Kadima primary.” What polls are they reading? He barely has a shot. Ha’aretz’s Yossi Verter puts his money on Benjamin Netanyahu, the Likud opposition leader and former PM.
  • Don’t mess with outreach

    Friday
    Jul 18,2008

    Yesterday we linked to an opinion piece in the Jerusalem Post criticizing Orthodox outreach programs aimed at non-Orthodox young people. One of the groups in question — the Orthodox Union’s NCSY — has actually been receiving some good press, with participants on one of its Israel trips visiting the home of Ehud Goldwasser, one of the two slain soldiers returned by Hezbollah on Wednesday.

    The New York Times:

    In Nahariya, the hometown of Sergeant Goldwasser, which is a few miles
    south of Rosh Hanikra, residents and a busload of American teenagers in the country for a summer education program lighted candles and prayed.

    The Jerusalem Post:

    At one point, in front of the two story red roofed Nahariya home where the Goldwassers were sitting waiting for news, a bus load of American teens touring Israel pulled up and lit a few tea lights on the sidewalk.

    “When we heard what was happening here we wanted to come and show our support,” said Gwenn Barney of Pittsburgh.

    Here’s the press release issued by the O.U., with comments from some of the participants: (more…)

    The day after: Israel reacts

    Thursday
    Jul 17,2008

    The day after Israel’s prisoner swap deal with Hezbollah, there was pain and anger in the Jewish state.

  • Ari Shavit in Ha’aretz:

    Here are the results of Israel’s war against Hezbollah so far. Hezbollah is bringing home a living murderer, and Israel is bringing home two dead soldiers - over whose capture it sacrificed 160 other soldiers and civilians.

    Hezbollah celebrates a symbolic victory, and Israel is in ideological crisis.

    Hezbollah has won almost complete political control over Lebanon, and Israel wallows in irrevocable political chaos.

    Hezbollah is armed with 40,000 rockets threatening most of Israel’s territory, while Israel has no response.

    Hezbollah increases its firepower four or five times, and Israel remains feebly silent.

    You can read on, but it doesn’t get any less depressing.

  • Shlomo Avineri in Ha’aretz wrote, “It is clear that there are a few general principles that apply to these types of negotiations, and that Israel did not observe them.”

    The government made a grave mistake when it allowed itself to follow public opinion, which treated the abducted soldiers like little Jewish boys kidnapped by Cossacks rather than soldiers in the army of the Jewish state. The government must tell the public and the families with total conviction that it will do everything in its power to free the soldiers within the boundaries of Israel’s overall interests - but not “everything.” Just as the government has the right to send soldiers into battle, and perhaps to their deaths, so too does it have the right to view the abductees’ fate in the framework of the state’s broader strategic interests.

  • A Jerusalem Post editorial focused on the contrasting images yesterday from the two sides, Israel and Lebanon:

    Hizbullah’s greatest loss, perhaps, has been its standing in the eyes of principled people everywhere, who can now see the difference between a political culture that valorizes brutality and celebrates a killer as its national conscience, and one that manages a quiet dignity even in the most trying of times.

  • Ynet’s Uri Orbach writes an open letter to the Lebanese people:

    It has been 30 years yet you still cannot distinguish between a national hero and a-child killer. For you, it’s enough that someone killed a Jew, even if it happens to be a young girl from Nahariya, in order for you to welcome him with great honor…

    With every proud display and rally for your heroes, you are being taken over the by Hizbullah gang, headed by the cannibal of bodies, Sheikh Nasrallah. The fire coming out of this bramble has been eating up Lebanon’s cedars for years now.

    Nasrallah is a man who reveals his true face even when in hiding; he is the man who also exposes your true face.

  • Israel Harel of Ha’aretz: “This was no way to fulfill our duty and bring home the boys - by letting a terrorist organization string us along, right up to the last second.” Calling the swap a “humiliating and exorbitantly expensive deal,” Harel writes that “the Shalit deal, could be - if the media keep hurtling with no brakes - much more difficult and expensive than the sad ending of the Regev and Goldwasser deal.”

    A moral society doesn’t let terrorists abuse it. A moral society doesn’t give in to immoral extortion and doesn’t pay a price that endangers the future of its soldiers and civilians, while sowing the seeds for the next abductions and ensuing concessions. A strong moral society - as we still are - teaches the kidnappers a lesson and leads them to the painful conclusion that kidnapping doesn’t pay.

  • Israel’s PR campaign on Kuntar

    • Filed under: Israel
    Thursday
    Jul 17,2008

    On YouTube, Israel is trying to sway hearts and minds about the moral depravity of newly released Lebanese prisoner Samir Kuntar, who was convicted of killing four Israelis, including a 4-year-old girl and her father, in 1979.

    Israel tells the Kuntar story here:

    Here’s an Arabic-language video of an Israeli official talking about Kuntar (we’re working on getting an English transcript):

    The Arab world reacts to the swap

    Thursday
    Jul 17,2008

    Not everyone in the Arab world is impressed by Hezbollah’s accomplishments in the prisoner swap deal, the Jerusalem Post reports.

  • The London-based A-Sharq al-Awsat daily noted that the deal “cost Hezbollah more than $7 billion, more than 1,200 dead and 4,500 wounded Lebanese citizens.”
  • Lebanon’s Al Anwar newspaper ran an editorial saying it was “shameful to see members of the government in Beirut join the celebrations of Hezbollah.”
  • However, the dominant viewpoint seemed to be the one shared by most Israelis — that the deal represented a victory for Hezbollah and strengthened the Iranian-backed Shiite group’s standing.

  • An editorial in Abu Dhabi’s The National noted that with dismay: “Hezbollah should be taken to task by the Lebanese for the suffering it brought on the country with its kidnappings. But successes such as yesterday’s prisoner exchange only increase its public standing.”
  • Al Jazeera’s senior political analyst, Marwan Bishara, sees in the swap a hopeful sign that the volatile region may be turning away from war and toward diplomacy: “If [Lebanon] continues its march through a relatively peaceful summer, it is a sign the Middle East is turning its back on war in favour of diplomacy.”
  • In a chat room on Al Jazeera’s English-language Web site, readers share their views about the swap.
  • For more Arab world headlines, see here.

    The swap and the pain

    Wednesday
    Jul 16,2008

    The wrenching images of today’s prisoner swap between Israel and Hezbollah — in which the Regev and Goldwasser families learned that their loves ones were dead while Israel handed over Lebanese murderer Samir Kuntar to Hezbollah — commanded the attention of all of Israel today.

    Israeli media anticipated and reported on the event with a combination of pain, anger and resignation:

    Media Line’s David Harris, in Ynet: “The poster on the Lebanese side of the border said it all: Israel sheds tears of sorrow, Lebanon sheds tears of joy.”

    Ma’ariv has an interview with the man who captured Samir Kuntar (Hebrew): “After 29 years, Rami Salmon recalls the capture of the terrorist and tells of the thought that still bugs him: Would he have changed history if he shot him?”

    Ha’aretz editorial: “The cabinet’s approval of the prisoner swap with Hezbollah, despite the ‘blatantly unsatisfactory’ report the organization delivered on the fate of Ron Arad, requires the cabinet to now act urgently to free Gilad Shalit.”

    Jerusalem Post editorial: “The Lebanese people and government - and those others in the Arab world, including among the Palestinians, so delighted by Kuntar’s release - might want to ask themselves whether this monster is worthy of such glorification. Is he the kind of man they want as their idol? And if so, what does that say about them?”

    JTA’s Dina Kraft has a piece in The New York Times on the old wound the swap deal reopened for the Israeli family whose life Kuntar destroyed.

    Keshet TV has video footage of Goldwasser and Regev in happier times, on reserve duty in 2004.

    Lebanon declared a national holiday Wednesday to welcome home Kuntar and the other terrorists released from Israel (Channel 10 and Ha’aretz): Watch video.

    Talansky tales

    • Filed under: Israel
    Tuesday
    Jul 15,2008

    We’ve heard a lot of things about Long Island Jewish businessman Morris Talansky since he was linked two months ago to alleged financial improprieties involving Ehud Olmert. Now comes New York magazine with a piece offering more details about the “Great Neck macher.”

    A transcript of secret tapes obtained by New York Magazine suggests that Talansky can indeed be willful and determined, and even threatening.

    Among the details:

  • Talansky suggested that a debtor’s car would be bombed if he didn’t return money he owed Talansky.
  • Talansky sent three “goons” to the home of a debtor to intimidate him and his associates, including rabbis, whom Talansky felt had fleeced him.
  • And then, of course, there’s the stuff we already knew, like that Talansky is under investigation in Nassau County for allegedly assaulting his 84-year-old former dentist over a bill dispute.

    Back in Israel, Talasnky, 75, is scheduled to be cross-examined this week by Olmert’s lawyers.

    Speak softly…

    Tuesday
    Jul 15,2008

    Does Israel’s warmongering on Iran serve the interests of the Jewish state? Some former Israeli military officials tell Israel’s Channel 10 that Israel would be better off speaking softly and carrying a big stick.

    President Katsav

    • Filed under: Israel
    Monday
    Jul 14,2008

    According to the English-language Web site of the president of the State of Israel, Moshe Katsav is still president. The Hebrew site, however, features the current president, Shimon Peres. Oversight or conspiracy?

    The anti-Bush world view

    Monday
    Jul 14,2008

    The New York Times has three opinions pieces today calling for a reversal in various elements of the Bush administration’s Middle East policy.

    1) Barack Obama reaffirms his commitment to pulling out U.S troops from Iraq:

    The call by Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki for a timetable for the removal of American troops from Iraq presents an enormous opportunity. We should seize this moment to begin the phased redeployment of combat troops that I have long advocated, and that is needed for long-term success in Iraq and the security interests of the United States.

    2) James Rubin argues that the United States should open a diplomatic post in Iran:

    America has not sent diplomats to Iran since the 1979 hostage crisis. Washington’s interests are managed by the Swiss government in Tehran. But as in other hostile countries, like Cuba, Washington could set up an interests section in Tehran even while formal diplomatic relations are suspended. Housed in the Swiss Embassy, this post would process visa requests and handle other consular matters.

    Such an outpost should not be seen as or used for an intelligence operation. Rather, it would give American diplomats an opportunity to observe the country’s complex politics firsthand. There are no current American foreign service officers who have ever been posted there. Setting up an interests section should help ensure that American policy is not born of ignorance.

    3) Roger Cohen explores (online) the Scandinavian view that the Unite States and the West have made a big mistake by shunning engagement with enemies and failing to keep channels open to Hamas and Syria:

    Norway’s message to the United States is blunt: the next administration, whether headed by Barack Obama or John McCain, should pronounce the war on terror over. Because it has tended to isolate the United States, polarize the world, inflate the enemy, conflate diverse movements and limit scope for dialogue, its time has passed.

    JTA

    Breaking News

    Recent Comments