
Time is on the Palestinians’ side
Why should the Palestinians compromise if Israel consistently gives in? Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told a Jordanian newspaper. All the Palestinians have to do is wait, and Israel will offer more concessions.
MEMRI has the translation and this summary:
In a June 25, 2009 interview with the Jordanian daily Al-Dustour, Palestinian Authority negotiations department head Saeb Ereqat said that the previous Israeli government, under Ehud Olmert, had offered PA President Mahmoud 'Abbas territory equal in size to 100% of the land occupied in 1967, by means of a land swap. Ereqat explained, however, that the PA would not agree to a land swap before Israel recognized the Palestinians' right to sovereignty over all the territory occupied in 1967. He added that there had been a steady erosion in Israel's position over the years, to the point that it had recently offered the Palestinians 100% of the territory; therefore, the Palestinians had no reason to rush into accepting the Israeli proposals. He stressed that the Right of Return and monetary compensation for the refugees were not mutually exclusive, and that the Palestinians would insist on receiving both.
Addressing the issue of Hamas, he said that nobody was asking it to recognize Israel, but that any government in which Hamas was a partner would have to recognize Israel and the commitments undertaken by the PLO.
Ereqat stated further that the Palestinians were acting in full coordination with Jordan and keeping it informed of all Israeli proposals and of their replies to these proposals. Regarding Iran, he said that it did not pose a threat, as was frequently claimed.
After Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared his conditional acceptance of an eventual Palestinian state in a speech at Bar-Ilan University last month, Erakat had this to say (in a story by JTA's Leslie Susser):
Chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat complained that by taking core issues like Jerusalem and refugees off the table, the new Israeli leader had closed the door on peace talks.
"Netanyahu will have to wait a thousand years to find a single Palestinian who will cooperate with him on the basis of his Bar-Ilan speech," Erakat declared.
2 Comments
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
Rachel - in the negotiations over a period of years, things like civil war in Iraq or Lebanon, or Egypt falling to the Brotherhood would all be wonderful things for Hamas, and appalling for Israel. It would support hard-line refusal to negotiate, terrorism, and another infitada. Anyway, I think none of those things will happen in that way.
More realistically, certainly this is Fatah promoting how tough they can be in negotiations. Abbas is seen as a quisling, as Lieberman so unhelpfully pointed out, yet Erakat still said that
“any government in which Hamas was a partner would have to recognize Israel and the commitments undertaken by the PLO”
Clearly Hamas have put their ‘recognizing Israel’ chip at the level of the pre-’67 borders, so they certainly don’t yet agree to that.
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.
Already a JTA member?
Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Jonathan on Is Tel Aviv or Jerusalem the real Israel?
- Don on Time cover mashup: Suckling Bibi
- Terry N. Gardner on Israeli para-Athlete Moran Samuel wins gold, saves the day with her own rendition of 'Hatikvah'
- Michael Poppers on Israeli para-Athlete Moran Samuel wins gold, saves the day with her own rendition of 'Hatikvah'
- Ed Greenberg on Israeli para-Athlete Moran Samuel wins gold, saves the day with her own rendition of 'Hatikvah'
Share



Rachel Golem
07/14/09 06:27 PM
Iran is on fire. Iraq will turn into a huge bloodbath. Lebanon will follow and Egypt will get taken over by the “Brotherhood” after Mubarak.
I really don’t see how time is on their side????