
Do you owe Israelis an apology?
In the wake of the recent Hamas-Israel war, two Israeli columnists and the Zionist Organization of America are calling on supporters of disengagement to apologize for the Gaza pullout in 2005.
Ha'aretz columnist Nadav Shragai :
Now, after the war and just before the election whirlwind sucks in our politicians once again, it would be appropriate for many of them to go out of their way and visit the mobile-home sites where those uprooted from Gush Katif live. This way they can tell them one small thing: I'm sorry. ...
The apology must also include everyone who painted those who warned that the rockets from Gaza would reach Sderot, Ashdod and Be'er Sheva as delusional and opponents of peace. Everyone who promised that they would "give it to them" after the first Qassam, but in the end cried about the moral and international constraints that prevented them from doing so, and for years abandoned the south. It must include those who took the name of democracy in vain and aided Sharon in deceiving Likud members and breaking his promises to honor Likud's decisions once it became clear to Sharon that the party's members did not agree with him.
And the Jerusalem Post's Michael Freund:
It is time for a Gaza apology and a national admission of guilt. All those who had a hand in the disengagement should apologize to the people of Israel, the residents of Sderot and the rest of the Negev and especially to those who lived in Gush Katif.
Through their folly, the supporters of withdrawal brought disaster upon this country. They destroyed the lives of thousands of Gaza's Jews, and put nearly a million Israelis within the cross-hairs of Hamas.
Unless Israel and its leaders have the courage to come to terms with their error, the danger of making additional such blunders will continue to accompany us well into the future.
Mistakes, wrote the author James Joyce, are portals of discovery. They allow us to gain a better glimpse of reality and to move forward. But that can only happen if in fact one is capable of embracing his own failings.
The disengagement, as its name implied, was supposed to disengage Israel from the Palestinians and their violence. But instead, as we have seen, it did just the opposite
It is about time that its proponents publicly acknowledged as much.
Meanwhile, the ZOA issued its own statement:
The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) has called upon Members of the Knesset (MKs) and other Israeli officials, journalists and Jewish leaders who gave their support to the 2005 Gaza/northern Samaria unilateral withdrawal to apologize to the Israeli electorate, which had voted overwhelmingly against that proposal in the January 2003 elections (when then-Labor leader, Amram Mitzna, lost decisively to Likud after campaigning strongly on a platform of unilateral withdrawal), as well as to the Jewish people and the uprooted Jews of Gaza and northern Samaria, whose lives have been turned upside down. Since the unilateral retreat from Gaza, the terror groups have enjoyed a massive boost in morale and Palestinian support, Gaza has been given over to terror groups who have smuggled in huge amounts of offensive weaponry and launched thousands of rockets upon Israel, while Al Qaeda affiliates have established themselves in the territory which Hamas seized by force from Mahmoud Abbas' Fateh in 2007. Such an apology should include a public recognition that one-sided concessions and withdrawals to an unreconstructed Palestinian Authority (PA) can only lead to more violence, not peace.
6 Comments
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
I beg to differ from Marc Paige comments. If Paige recalls his history, Israel offered to withdraw from territories that came under its control in 1967 and was met by the Arabs’: no negotiations, no recognition, no peace. The territories had no government having been under Egyptian and Jordanian occupation and in effect no polity had any claim to them. Judea and Samaria were part of lands declared open for Jewish settlement and in particular Gush Etzion was land siezed by Jordan. The Golan was not only given by the British to the French in violation of their mandate, but it had been used for nothing else except for aggression by the Syrians. Jews have a right to hold and settle any disputed land under theri control and Palestinians (since 1965) have a duty to negotiate with words, rather than violence, which territories they will have. And none of those must be allowed to be Jew free; if there are Muslim Israelis, it is only fair and reasonable that there should be Jewish Palestinians in the future.
I see Mr. Paige advocates the removal of Jews from the “West Bank”. I wonder, does Mr. Paige also advocate segregation among Blacks and Whites in the United States? Seems that policy was the focus of the civil rights struggle of the ‘60s about which Americans proudly celebrated this week with both MLK day and the inauguration of Barack Obama as President.
But I guess, for some reason, it is okay for otherwise intelligent people to think that what was morally wrong for Blacks is acceptable for Jews.
I disagree.
If Arabs cannot tolerate even one Jew in the territory that they claim for their state, then they are not ready for real peace between Israel and a Palestinian state.
What is more galling than Hamas claiming a “great victory?” The idiots who believe them. Every policy of Hamas has brought grief and economic ruin to Gaza. Hamas allows few personal freedoms, and, by provoking a more powerful military power, brought destruction to their little terrorist fiefdom. So they define their “victory” as surviving the disaster they caused. What a bunch of jerks!
After close to 18 years of futile (and bloody) negotiations on the so-called “peace process”, it is high time to go back to basics and abide by the provisions of international law (Mandate for Palestine, 1922) conferring full national rights to the Jewish people on lands west of the Jordan River. Anything else will perpetuate terror, false hopes to radical Islam and endless mayhem.
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.
Already a JTA member?
Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Claude S. on Connecting the dots: Susan G. Komen, J Street and Bill Clinton
- Yaakov Cohn on Connecting the dots: Susan G. Komen, J Street and Bill Clinton
- Herbert Kaine on Times travel writer on Israel: ‘A politically iffy burden’
- Lloyd Trufelman on Netanyahu doth protest too much?
- ASC on Times travel writer on Israel: ‘A politically iffy burden’
Share



Marc Paige
01/22/09 12:40 AM
The Zionist Organization of America owes an apology to Israel for pushing a policy of placing settlements in the occupied territory of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, costing thousands of Israeli and Palestinian lives, draining resources from Israel proper, and making peace between the two parties that much more complicated.