JTA: The Global News Service of the Jewish People

Progressive Jews get ‘Righteously Indignant’ at Boston conference

Earlier this week I attended the Righteous Indignation Conference, a three-day forum and workshop which provided a forum for progressive Jewish activists to share best practices, discuss current strategies and build community among each other. The event, which took place at Hebrew College in Newton Centre, Massachusetts, brought together over 100 Jewish activists from around the U.S., representing dozens of social action organizations, from the American Jewish World Service to J Street.

Among the various panel discussions and workshops which took place during the course of the conference, the two sessions which caused the greatest stir were the keynote panel, "Building a Progressive Jewish Movement," and the Israel panel, "Talking About Israel."

"Building a Progressive Jewish Movement," which took place Sunday evening, featured Alana Alpert of Jews for Racial & Economic Justice, Michael Brown of the Jewish Organizing Initiative, Jane Ramsey of the Jewish Council on Urban Affairs, Jaime Rapaport of the Progressive Jewish Alliance, and Rabbi Sid Schwartz of Panim. The conversation focused on why previous efforts to organize a national progressive Jewish movement have failed and what the progressive Jewish community has learned from these experiences.

The discussion took an interesting turn when Rabbi Schwartz suggested that what the progressive Jewish community needs is to not build a "movement," which he felt was marginalizing, but rather to alter the concept of Jewish identity itself so that being progressive could be seen as being synonymous with being Jewish. The remark set off a fevered response from the audience, which took turns at the microphone addressing Rabbi Schwartz's assertion.

Unfortunately my MP3 recorder's batteries had died earlier in the session unbeknownst to me, and so after checking the recorder and replacing the batteries, I was only able to get the tail end of the discussion. You can, however, listen to the discussion, beginning from the near-end of Rabbi Schwartz's remarks, below.

[audio:/images/archive/righteous_indignation_050408_keynote.mp3]

The other panel, "Talking About Israel," which took place Monday evening, featured Dr. Dianne Balser of Brit Tzedek V'Shalom, Joseph Gindi, a Hornstein Fellow at Brandeis University, Dr. Leonard Fein, a seasoned liberal activist and writer, Rabbi Brian Walt of Rabbis for Human Rights, and Rabbi Melissa Weintraub of Encounter, a new program which brings American Jewish leaders to visit with Palestinians in the Occupied Territories.

Each speaker lauded the importance of liberal pro-Israel activism and explored the challenges posed by right-wing pro-Israel groups which often cast progressive politics as harmful to Israel's interests. They also debated what was described as the "narrowing window of opportunity" that will allow for the success of the two-state solution, warning that if action is not taken quickly, a one-state solution will become inevitable.

In what would be seen as the most controversial presentation delivered that evening, Joseph Gindi spoke about what he considers the incompatibility of ethnic nationalism and civil democracy, and lamented what he sees as the damage to diaspora Jewish communities' sense of self-worth wrought by the primacy given to Zionism. Gindi's advocacy of the reinvigoration of diaspora nationalism over Zionism set off rancor among some panelists and audience members, with Leonard Fein noting that, in response to Gindi's presentation, he had fought the urge to walk off stage as an act of political theatre. Others in the audience would later tell me that they were glad that Gindi was there to express what many of them have been afraid to say publicly.

You can listen to the full panel discussion, along with the audience discussion, below.

[audio:/images/archive/righteous_indignation_israel.mp3]

To subscribe to JTA's Behind the News podcast, click here.

(If, when listening via the audio player on our site, our podcasts sound like recordings of Alvin and the Chipmunks, that means you need to upgrade your Flash player. You can do so by clicking here.)

  • Share Share

Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments

YITZI

05/07/08 08:02 PM

“a new program which brings American Jewish leaders to visit with Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. “ I say let’s visit Israel.  Israel needs us more than the Muslims.

“ and lamented what he sees as the damage to diaspora Jewish communities’ sense of self-worth wrought by the primacy given to Zionism. “ Our Chumash tells us that Zionisim is part of being Jewish.  Which of the speakers is Jewish and which likes the Muslim line better?

David Eckhaus

05/07/08 08:09 PM

These Liberal Jews who wear the cloak of Righteousness, believe they alone are good and of course better than their characterized right wing conservatives. They cannot live without investing themselves into everyones lives in order to give their lives some meaning.
They live in their own dream world in which they can control through “good intentions” the the goals of others lives.
They cannot fined any nation on Earth with a liberal persuasion that has accomplished what Representative government and capitalism has given
the great experiment called the United States of America.
The idea that Liberalism is being Jewish is the height of arrogance of those who hold themselves to be superior to all others.

Ruth King

05/07/08 10:42 PM

I upgraded FlASH PLAYER but still have difficulty understanding the Speakers. Is it possible to get written copies of speeches, particularly the one by Joseph Gindi. Thank you, Ruth King

Stan Horowitz

05/09/08 02:45 PM

Yitzi—Settling the land of Israel is certainly a mitzvah.  However, Zionism, which was a secular nationalist movement, was and is still by many considered assur and against the Torah.  Tzvi Yehuda Kook may have managed to convince those who hold by YU and the OU that you can redeem secular Zionism by coopting it for holy purposes, but no one who holds by the Agudah has ever truly believed that.

David—Dan Sieradski, who wrote this post, and Steven I. Weiss (another well-known Jewish blogger) debated the very subject you raise on Jewcy.com some time ago.  I recommend checking out their discussion and perhaps rethinking your statements.

Leave a Comment

To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.

Already a JTA member?

I forgot my password

Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!