The New York Times weighed in with its latest editorial on the fallout from the May 12 immigration raid at Agriprocessors, the largest kosher meatpacking plant in the U.S. (See previous editorial here).
Most of the newspaper’s ire was reserved for the federal government, whose criminalization of the illegal workers it called “a disgrace,” “a fraudulent exercise,” and “cruel” — echoing many of the descriptors used last week in hearings on the subject in Washington.
But the paper also rehearsed the litany of complaints against the company itself, in part to account for its outrage at the government’s targeting of the workers rather than the employers who hired them:
A slaughterhouse in Postville, Iowa, develops an ugly reputation for abusing animals and workers. Reports of dirty, dangerous conditions at the Agriprocessors kosher meatpacking plant accumulate for years, told by workers, union organizers, immigrant advocates and government investigators. A videotape by an animal-rights group shows workers pulling the windpipes out of living cows. A woman with a deformed hand tells a reporter of cutting meat for 12 hours a day, six days a week, for wages that labor experts call the lowest in the industry. This year, federal investigators amass evidence of rampant illegal hiring at the plant, which has been called “a kosher ‘Jungle.’ ”
The conditions at the Agriprocessors plant cry out for the cautious and deliberative application of justice.
5 Responses for "N.Y. Times: Agriprocessors’ reputation is “ugly”"
Again, I reiterate my earlier comment concerning the current state of the law in this matter; illegal immigrants broke the law by taking employment but AP was basically in the clear in hiring them.
Meanwhile, Congress has just bugged out for the summer leaving huge stacks of legislation undone. Something tells me that real, effective immigration reform will remain at the bottom of the pile even after they come back in September. And for this they each take home $180k a year. Good work if you can get it…
Time for a reality check. This plant ships interstate so Federal Meat inspectors are there whenever an animal is killed. These USDA employees demand a clean environment and they demand humane slaughter. They accept Kashrut methods of slaughter. Another level of inspection is at this plant, and that is the OU, or Orthodox Union. It all comes down to this is an Unionization issue and all of the usual management and labor tired warfare methods are in play. Call this what it is, a labor and management issue.
My major issue here is that as Jews, we are supposed to be above reproach in business, and AP has apparently not been in this perspective. I am in process, trying to take on the kosher prohibitions, and now I am leaning toward conservative hechshur since it places a high priority on Humaneness. I do not want to ingest the negative hormones put out by a suffering animal.
I also have to comment that if the USDA overseers and the OU oversight is present at every slaughter - hard to believe - than PETA would not have such a problem with AP. Their complaint was that AP would not agree to unannounced inspections, a complaint that would appear groundless if two overseers were actually there for every slaughter. And if they WERE indeed there, why was the filmed cruelty to animals allowed to happen? Truly there is some confusion here, and until this confusion is cleared up, I won’t be eating AP meat.
I saw the video and was disgusted! I grew up in a strictly kosher home and find this digusting and unacceptable that animals could be treated in such an inhumane manner. They need to be put out of business!
I am a former USDA Veterinary Meat Inspector. By Law, I could stop any abuses or improper, unsanitary handling ofmeat and meat products in any plant I was assigned, AND I COULD NOT BE FIRED! The Federal Law was written in 1906. This whole flap stinks - not from bad meat. A USDA veterinarian was/is required to be in the plant while in operation. Let’s hear from him/her.
Eugene M.Kravis, DVM
Leave a reply