Laura Rozen of Mother Jones reports that some conservative activists are disappointed with the organization launched by casino mogul Sheldon Adelson to generate support for President Bush’s Iraq policy:
In Las Vegas casino mogul Sheldon Adelson, foreign-policy hawks thought they had found the conservative answer to liberal philanthropist George Soros: a deep-pocketed benefactor eager to dole out generous sums to right-leaning advocacy groups and grassroots campaigns. Adelson’s largesse, they believed, would underwrite the further advancement of conservative causes—particularly those regarding national security—and allow conservatives to do well-financed battle with ideological adversaries such as MoveOn.org. …
So last year, when Adelson helped to establish Freedom’s Watch, a group that late last summer launched a $15 million media campaign in support of the U.S. troop surge in Iraq, hopes were high—both for Adelson and for Freedom’s Watch. As former White House press secretary and Freedom’s Watch official Ari Fleischer put it in August, “The cavalry is coming.”
Almost eight months later, some Freedom’s Watch watchers are wondering whether some of the cavalry got lost. Even as the group has mounted a new campaign to coincide with General David Petraeus’ testimony on Iraq to Congress this week, there has been conservative grumbling about Freedom’s Watch—and Adelson. And several Freedom’s Watch staffers, including its first president, Bradley Blakeman, have left the group. Now Washington conservatives are worrying that Adelson may not be the white knight they had wished for.
In not-for-attribution interviews, a few conservative think tank hands and activists expressed frustration that Freedom’s Watch has yet to develop a comprehensive strategy, and they gripe that it has been slow to set up a MoveOn-style infrastructure. Freedom’s Watch hasn’t realized its full potential, they say, in part because Adelson overly involves himself in the group’s decision-making and won’t heed the good advice of…well, people like them.
4 Responses for "Sheldon Adelson: White knight or white elephant?"
It’s really sad when Jews get on the conservative bandwagon. It smells of opportunism; what the right stands for is totally against Jewish values.
With a 50% internarriage rate and a huge assimiliation rate is this money really being well spent supporting a dolt who encouraged the worlds largest vegetable to make Aza Judenrein for ‘peace in our time’?
It is a shame that such a finely nuanced piece, noting that Adelson “won’t heed the good advice of…well, people like them” has to be punctuated with a blatantly bigoted comment that conservatism is not consonant with Jewish values.
No wonder Republicans think Democrats are stupid. As long as Democrats continue to portray Republicans as evil, they will not only sound like idiots, but undermine their own moral stature as well.
Joshua
http://wholehogblog.com
Well, Joshua, Republicans have been portraying Democrats (and even non-fascist Republicans like Lowell Weicker and even Arlen Specter) as worse than evil for decades. Or haven’t you turned on the TV since 1979? With the conservative blueprint for taking over the media and all other arbiters of objective reality laid out by William Simon of the Olin Foundation, it’s pretty obvious to anyone who’s been paying attention that the Republicans have set the demonization tone for a very long time.
Leave a reply