DCCC chairman: RJC “shameful” http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/dccc-chairman-rjc-shameful/ The chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee called the Republican Jewish Coalition “shameful” for the way the group has tried to use Israel “as a wedge issue.” Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) said the organziation was breaking with a tradition “that has united Democrats and Republicans since Harry Truman.” He spoke at a reception for members of Congress at the National Jewish Democratic Council’s Washington Conference. Van Hollen did come under criticism from pro-Israel constituents in his suburban Washington, D.C. district two years ago after he wrote a letter to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice telling her she should have told Israel to limit its attacks during the Lebanon War – although he also said that Israel was “justified” in defending itself against Hezbollah. en-us efingerhut@jta.org Copyright 2008 2008-09-24T;07:35:06-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com Ms Elise’ advice is as bad as it can be, and her hate for America and Jews is quite evident from her post.  Her information is also totally wrong. factcheck is highly biased, and they are “in the tank” for Obama.  They’ve been busted. Also, a close adviser to Obama, and someone who will be in his administration, advocates the USA invading Israel in order to protect the miserable wretches who are constantly trying to kill us. http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/obama-chief-adv.html A vote for Obama is a vote for the destruction, not only of the USA, but of Israel as well. Ms Elise’ advice is as bad as it can be, and her hate for America and Jews is quite evident from her post.  Her information is also totally wrong.

factcheck is highly biased, and they are “in the tank” for Obama.  They’ve been busted.

Also, a close adviser to Obama, and someone who will be in his administration, advocates the USA invading Israel in order to protect the miserable wretches who are constantly trying to kill us.
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/10/obama-chief-adv.html

A vote for Obama is a vote for the destruction, not only of the USA, but of Israel as well.

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by veccelliogroup@yahoo.com The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is 100% correct.  Everything the Republicans insinuate are insulting to anyone’s intelligence.  My grandfather was a zionist and fought for the creation of the State of Israel. If he were alive, he would be well informed and vote for Obama.  Here is Obama’s policy on Israel.  Why don’t all of you read it and stop listening to Fox news.  Get the facts not the illusions presented by the Republican Party.  http://origin.barackobama.com/pdf/IsraelFactSheet.pdf.  Obama’s going to win!  If jewish readers are so concerned about Israel, it would be a good idea to move there. We have other issues that affect this COUNTRY, not to mention healthcare, creating jobs, taxing people who make over $250,000, ending the illegal occupation in Iraq (not to mention Israel was totally against this occupation because she is now less safe than before.) Get the facts and stop spreading unproven lies.  Also go to factcheck.org.  That is a non-partisen website. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is 100% correct.  Everything the Republicans insinuate are insulting to anyone’s intelligence.  My grandfather was a zionist and fought for the creation of the State of Israel. If he were alive, he would be well informed and vote for Obama.  Here is Obama’s policy on Israel.  Why don’t all of you read it and stop listening to Fox news.  Get the facts not the illusions presented by the Republican Party.  http://origin.barackobama.com/pdf/IsraelFactSheet.pdf. 

Obama’s going to win!  If jewish readers are so concerned about Israel, it would be a good idea to move there. We have other issues that affect this COUNTRY, not to mention healthcare, creating jobs, taxing people who make over $250,000, ending the illegal occupation in Iraq (not to mention Israel was totally against this occupation because she is now less safe than before.) Get the facts and stop spreading unproven lies.  Also go to factcheck.org.  That is a non-partisen website.

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by apbluebass@erols.com This schmucks donor list is a who’s who of the failed and fallen that caused this mess.  The Presidential race ... whatever, but its time to Vote This Anti- Semitic Bum Out! This schmucks donor list is a who’s who of the failed and fallen
that caused this mess.  The Presidential race ... whatever, but its time to Vote This Anti- Semitic Bum Out!

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com Sorry, Larry Levy, but saying it ain’t so doesn’t mean it ain’t. http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/20/report-organizers-of-iran-rally-threatened-with-loss-of-tax-exempt-status-if-they-invited-palin/ And that brings up another question, why Obama’s church was allowed to actually campaign for him, and not lose their tax exeption. http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=2653 Sorry, Larry Levy, but saying it ain’t so doesn’t mean it ain’t.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/20/report-organizers-of-iran-rally-threatened-with-loss-of-tax-exempt-status-if-they-invited-palin/

And that brings up another question, why Obama’s church was allowed to actually campaign for him, and not lose their tax exeption.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=2653

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com Sorry, Larry Levy, but saying it ain’t so doesn’t mean it ain’t. http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/20/report-organizers-of-iran-rally-threatened-with-loss-of-tax-exempt-status-if-they-invited-palin/ “Hillary Clinton, who cancelled her scheduled appearance at the event after learning of Palin’s plans to attend, had been confirmed months earlier. But Palin’s participation made the non-profit groups planning the event concerned they would lose their tax-exempt status, if only one party’s presidential or vice presidential candiate was invited to speak. “The IRS is very clear, Hillary Clinton does not equal Sarah Palin,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “You have to have equal representation of candidates.” [they said] The organizers reached out to the Obama campaign for the first time Wednesday morning, asking Joe Biden to speak to balance Palin, but in the end the decision was made to not allow political candidates at the event at all [Biden refused to go], the organizer said.” http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/18/1421633.aspx Never mind that this was not a campaign event, which means it doesn’t fall under the IRS restrictions AT ALL!  But if a law suit was filed, it would have been costly, and if a Leftist judge got the case, the verdict wouldn’t necessarily conform to the law. And that brings up another question, why Obama’s church was allowed to actually campaign for him, and not lose their tax exeption. http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=2653 Sorry, Larry Levy, but saying it ain’t so doesn’t mean it ain’t.
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/09/20/report-organizers-of-iran-rally-threatened-with-loss-of-tax-exempt-status-if-they-invited-palin/

“Hillary Clinton, who cancelled her scheduled appearance at the event after learning of Palin’s plans to attend, had been confirmed months earlier. But Palin’s participation made the non-profit groups planning the event concerned they would lose their tax-exempt status, if only one party’s presidential or vice presidential candiate was invited to speak.

“The IRS is very clear, Hillary Clinton does not equal Sarah Palin,” the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. “You have to have equal representation of candidates.” [they said]

The organizers reached out to the Obama campaign for the first time Wednesday morning, asking Joe Biden to speak to balance Palin, but in the end the decision was made to not allow political candidates at the event at all [Biden refused to go], the organizer said.”
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2008/09/18/1421633.aspx

Never mind that this was not a campaign event, which means it doesn’t fall under the IRS restrictions AT ALL!  But if a law suit was filed, it would have been costly, and if a Leftist judge got the case, the verdict wouldn’t necessarily conform to the law.

And that brings up another question, why Obama’s church was allowed to actually campaign for him, and not lose their tax exeption.
http://www.israpundit.com/2008/?p=2653

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by LLevy14573@aol.com Keep the Republican Talking points ( Lies ) coming. No one has threaten to take away the RJC tax exampt. Nothing worst than Jewish racism. Keep the Republican Talking points ( Lies ) coming. No one has threaten to take away the RJC tax exampt. Nothing worst than Jewish racism.

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com Angellight’s quote is from a far Left fantasy based propaganda rag. It is completely false.  But, there are people who do want to, and in a few isolated cases are trying to do this.  But it is the Democrats, not the Republicans, who are making that push.  Here is one example… “Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner has a reputation as the most partisan state official in Ohio. And she works hard to earn it. The Democrat’s latest stunt rejected absentee ballots for thousands of Republicans. . . . . Two Hamilton County voters have sued, accusing her of “the disenfranchisement of thousands of voters.” The John McCain campaign sent out more than 1 million applications for absentee ballots to Republicans. Each had a line at the top next to a box: “I am a qualified elector.” Brunner sent a memo telling county election officials to reject those applications for absentee ballots if the box was not checked. “Failure to check the box leaves both the applicant and the board of elections without verification that the applicant is a ‘qualified elector’,” she wrote. But that’s contrary to state law and Brunner doesn’t have the authority, according to the lawsuit and an opinion from Hamilton County’s Republican Prosecutor Joe Deters. Ohio law allows voters to request an absentee ballot on the back of a grocery sack if they want to, as long as they include their name, address, date of birth, signature and either a driver’s license number, last four Social Security numbers or a valid picture I.D.” http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080923/COL05/809230318/1055/NEWS (H/T-DrBulldog&Ronin blog) NOTE - Obama has many surrogates out there spreading propaganda.  You must check it yourself, because they will either never bring proof, or what they do bring is not true. Angellight’s quote is from a far Left fantasy based propaganda rag. It is completely false.  But, there are people who do want to, and in a few isolated cases are trying to do this.  But it is the Democrats, not the Republicans, who are making that push.  Here is one example…

“Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner has a reputation as the most partisan state official in Ohio. And she works hard to earn it. The Democrat’s latest stunt rejected absentee ballots for thousands of Republicans.
. . . .
Two Hamilton County voters have sued, accusing her of “the disenfranchisement of thousands of voters.”

The John McCain campaign sent out more than 1 million applications for absentee ballots to Republicans. Each had a line at the top next to a box: “I am a qualified elector.”

Brunner sent a memo telling county election officials to reject those applications for absentee ballots if the box was not checked. “Failure to check the box leaves both the applicant and the board of elections without verification that the applicant is a ‘qualified elector’,” she wrote.

But that’s contrary to state law and Brunner doesn’t have the authority, according to the lawsuit and an opinion from Hamilton County’s Republican Prosecutor Joe Deters.

Ohio law allows voters to request an absentee ballot on the back of a grocery sack if they want to, as long as they include their name, address, date of birth, signature and either a driver’s license number, last four Social Security numbers or a valid picture I.D.”
http://news.cincinnati.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080923/COL05/809230318/1055/NEWS
(H/T-DrBulldog&Ronin blog)

NOTE - Obama has many surrogates out there spreading propaganda.  You must check it yourself, because they will either never bring proof, or what they do bring is not true.

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by wdsoulplane@yahoo.com Please send this to your friends and family! RFK, Jr.: “Let me tell you about one other of these scams people should know about. If you’re a newly registered voter - and of course the Democrats have done these gigantic registration drives - 12 million people on registration - if you’re a new voter you MUST include your license or some other state I.D. when you come to vote. What that means is that if you’re a college kid (and college kids now - they’re sending in absentee ballots - they’re not going to the voting place, they do everything online or they do everything remotely - they don’t dream of going to the precinct house voting on election day and waiting in a long line) so if they send in the absentee ballot and they don’t include a color copy of their license their vote is going to be thrown into a trash can. And none of these people know this because you have had to read the law in order to know it. So there is no notification for when you fill out your registration form, so all of those 12 million people that the Democrats have registered: those ballots are going to be just thrown out. http://www.truthout.org/article/rfk-jr-and-mike-papantonio-is-your-vote-safe Please send this to your friends and family!

RFK, Jr.: “Let me tell you about one other of these scams people should know about. If you’re a newly registered voter - and of course the Democrats have done these gigantic registration drives - 12 million people on registration - if you’re a new voter you MUST include your license or some other state I.D. when you come to vote. What that means is that if you’re a college kid (and college kids now - they’re sending in absentee ballots - they’re not going to the voting place, they do everything online or they do everything remotely - they don’t dream of going to the precinct house voting on election day and waiting in a long line) so if they send in the absentee ballot and they don’t include a color copy of their license their vote is going to be thrown into a trash can. And none of these people know this because you have had to read the law in order to know it. So there is no notification for when you fill out your registration form, so all of those 12 million people that the Democrats have registered: those ballots are going to be just thrown out.

http://www.truthout.org/article/rfk-jr-and-mike-papantonio-is-your-vote-safe

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by natanostrich@yahoo.com Matt, After spending 20 years with an Israel-hating pastor, hanging out with Palestinian activists, stating that “Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinians” and criticizing Israel’s security barrier and the Likud Party, can anyone “produce a shred of evidence” that Obama’s words of support for Israel are actually his? Matt,

After spending 20 years with an Israel-hating pastor, hanging out with Palestinian activists, stating that “Nobody is suffering more than the Palestinians” and criticizing Israel’s security barrier and the Likud Party, can anyone “produce a shred of evidence” that Obama’s words of support for Israel are actually his?

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com Matt, your question reeks of insincerity, and besides that is irrelevant. Kvetching over such silliness is only a distraction from the issues, but I think you know that, don’t you! There is one thing I might agree with you on.  You are really confused (that, or, more likely, you are trying to confuse people here.) Now, please deal with an issue, and stop trying to create a smokescreen.  Now that the conventions are over these anarchists just don’t know what to do with themselves. Matt, your question reeks of insincerity, and besides that is irrelevant.

Kvetching over such silliness is only a distraction from the issues, but I think you know that, don’t you!

There is one thing I might agree with you on.  You are really confused (that, or, more likely, you are trying to confuse people here.)

Now, please deal with an issue, and stop trying to create a smokescreen. 

Now that the conventions are over these anarchists just don’t know what to do with themselves.

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by matt297@hotmail.com I’m sorry to go back to this, but I have a question, and nobody else seems to be raising it. You probably know all about that fiasco at the Iran rally in NYC. Hillary Clinton was to speak, but after Sarah Palin was invited as well, Clinton backed out, and Palin was then herself subsequently dis-invited. Now a lot of people seem to be talking about the speech that Palin was supposed to deliver at the rally, and some are even praising her for its content. But I’m really confused. Specifically, why does everyone keep referring to the speech as “Sarah Palin’s speech”? Did she write it? (No. It was written by her handlers.) Did she deliver it? (No. She was dis-invited and thus never spoke it.) So in what sense is it Sarah Palin’s speech at all? Can anyone produce a shred of evidence that more than half the terms and nomenclature in that speech were even in her vocabulary before a month ago? So why is anybody patting Palin on the back for the speech? What has she actually done to deserve any of the credit? I’m sorry to go back to this, but I have a question, and nobody else seems to be raising it. You probably know all about that fiasco at the Iran rally in NYC. Hillary Clinton was to speak, but after Sarah Palin was invited as well, Clinton backed out, and Palin was then herself subsequently dis-invited. Now a lot of people seem to be talking about the speech that Palin was supposed to deliver at the rally, and some are even praising her for its content.

But I’m really confused. Specifically, why does everyone keep referring to the speech as “Sarah Palin’s speech”? Did she write it? (No. It was written by her handlers.) Did she deliver it? (No. She was dis-invited and thus never spoke it.)

So in what sense is it Sarah Palin’s speech at all? Can anyone produce a shred of evidence that more than half the terms and nomenclature in that speech were even in her vocabulary before a month ago?

So why is anybody patting Palin on the back for the speech? What has she actually done to deserve any of the credit?

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00 Comment by yonaton770@hotmail.com EXCUSE ME, BUT… Israel, the ONLY real ally of America in the Middle East, is a very real, not a “wedge,” issue! The only reason Obama doesn’t want the “issue” of Israel to be considered, is because he and all his advisers are so anti-Israel. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvdAWJ3tyR0 Obama’s brown-shirts threatened the RJC with removal of their tax exempt status if they invited Palin.  http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127679 Come to think of it, I don’t know why Obama’s church hasn’t had theirs taken away, with all the camaigning that’s done there. K’sima v’chasima tova EXCUSE ME, BUT…

Israel, the ONLY real ally of America in the Middle East, is a very real, not a “wedge,” issue! The only reason Obama doesn’t want the “issue” of Israel to be considered, is because he and all his advisers are so anti-Israel.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OvdAWJ3tyR0

Obama’s brown-shirts threatened the RJC with removal of their tax exempt status if they invited Palin. 
http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/127679
Come to think of it, I don’t know why Obama’s church hasn’t had theirs taken away, with all the camaigning that’s done there.

K’sima v’chasima tova

]]> 2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00