<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Candid Cantor&#45;UPDATE</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/candid-cantor/</link>
    <description>Sometimes, in this biz, you have to parse.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rkampeas@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2010</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2010-11-11T;23:48:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Norman Cone</title>
      <link>conenorm@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Leftist tendency in an openly leftist newspaper or blog is okay.

From JTA is neutrality expected . I presume that you are expecting

something else from NBC,CBS,ABC than from Al Jezeera, aren&#8217;t you? Yes, sorry, i mistyped. I know the difference between a

college and a colleague.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leftist tendency in an openly leftist newspaper or blog is okay.
<br />
From JTA is neutrality expected . I presume that you are expecting
<br />
something else from NBC,CBS,ABC than from Al Jezeera, aren&#8217;t you? Yes, sorry, i mistyped. I know the difference between a
<br />
college and a colleague.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T;03:01:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by matt walsh</title>
      <link>matt1walsh@gmail.com</link>
      <description>If not your interpretation, then what IS Cantor trying to say? It&#8217;s pretty clear what he is conveying.


@Norman What is your actual objection? Does the post present a fair interpretation? If not, why? 


Do you mean &#8220;colleagues&#8221;? And why would a leftist tendency be offensive or repulsive? Are people not entitled to their perspectives? Why is something criticizing the position of a Republican &#8220;offensive&#8221; in and of itself?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If not your interpretation, then what IS Cantor trying to say? It&#8217;s pretty clear what he is conveying.
</p>
<p>
@Norman What is your actual objection? Does the post present a fair interpretation? If not, why? 
</p>
<p>
Do you mean &#8220;colleagues&#8221;? And why would a leftist tendency be offensive or repulsive? Are people not entitled to their perspectives? Why is something criticizing the position of a Republican &#8220;offensive&#8221; in and of itself?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T;03:01:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Norman Cone</title>
      <link>conenorm@gmail.com</link>
      <description>I always thought that JTA is a Jewish News Agency and not one

of the Democratic Party. The leftist tendencies of Ron Kampeas

and some of his colleges are particularly offensive if not repulsive.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought that JTA is a Jewish News Agency and not one
<br />
of the Democratic Party. The leftist tendencies of Ron Kampeas
<br />
and some of his colleges are particularly offensive if not repulsive.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T;03:01:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
