<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Did Obama misplay settlements issue?</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/did-obama-misplay-settlements-issue/</link>
    <description>A variety of voices suggest that the Obama administration botched the Israeli&#45;Palestinian issue by publicly insisting on a full settlement freeze.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>aeden@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-05T;21:22:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Walid Maaytah</title>
      <link>wmaaytah@kmc.jo</link>
      <description>The settlements issue is and will continue to be at the very forefront of any potential progress or lack of it, realistically speaking, regardless of who likes it or not. Obama, the Arabs and Israel itself know that. 


Those who refuse to understand or appreciate the sensitivity and significance of this issue, and continue to repeat the same trite and tired reasoning, know that being stubborn and unyielding about it will undoubtedly render the whole effort to start any negotiations, much less make peace, a waste of time and a mere stalling tactic. 


Simple old logic, which is no secret, is the fact that not freezing all settlements activities, regardless of its scope, will only lead to reducing further and further the piece of land where the Palestinians may be able to have a state on, one day; and by keeping it unchecked will naturally lead to leaving no land worth mentioning to seriously negotiate about. And we all know, well most of us, that this is the real intention behind Netanyahu&#8217;s government&#8217;s insistence on not restricting, seriously, settlements building and expansion. 


Peace is in Israel’s interest as much as it is in The Palestinians’ interests, and God help us all if those who have no interest in peace end up having the upper hand, which we’ll all then live to regret – sooner or later.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The settlements issue is and will continue to be at the very forefront of any potential progress or lack of it, realistically speaking, regardless of who likes it or not. Obama, the Arabs and Israel itself know that. 
</p>
<p>
Those who refuse to understand or appreciate the sensitivity and significance of this issue, and continue to repeat the same trite and tired reasoning, know that being stubborn and unyielding about it will undoubtedly render the whole effort to start any negotiations, much less make peace, a waste of time and a mere stalling tactic. 
</p>
<p>
Simple old logic, which is no secret, is the fact that not freezing all settlements activities, regardless of its scope, will only lead to reducing further and further the piece of land where the Palestinians may be able to have a state on, one day; and by keeping it unchecked will naturally lead to leaving no land worth mentioning to seriously negotiate about. And we all know, well most of us, that this is the real intention behind Netanyahu&#8217;s government&#8217;s insistence on not restricting, seriously, settlements building and expansion. 
</p>
<p>
Peace is in Israel’s interest as much as it is in The Palestinians’ interests, and God help us all if those who have no interest in peace end up having the upper hand, which we’ll all then live to regret – sooner or later.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Yosef Hartuv</title>
      <link>yosefandmelody@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Why Are Arabs Unhappy with Hillary? Blame Obama&#45; J. Tobin

If Hillary Clinton is unhappy about the abuse she is taking from the Arab world over her equivocal attitude toward Israel, then she should blame President Obama and those of his foreign&#45;policy advisers who urged him to make picking a fight with the Jewish state over settlements one of their top priorities once they took office.

http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/11/why&#45;are&#45;arabs&#45;unhappy&#45;with&#45;hillary.html</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Are Arabs Unhappy with Hillary? Blame Obama- J. Tobin
<br />
If Hillary Clinton is unhappy about the abuse she is taking from the Arab world over her equivocal attitude toward Israel, then she should blame President Obama and those of his foreign-policy advisers who urged him to make picking a fight with the Jewish state over settlements one of their top priorities once they took office.
<br />
<a href="http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-are-arabs-unhappy-with-hillary.html">http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/11/why-are-arabs-unhappy-with-hillary.html</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
