<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Berman, Goldstone, the grownups</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/berman-goldstone-the-grownups/</link>
    <description>Last Friday, I compared a congressional resolution condemning the U.N. Human Rights Council Goldstone report on last winter&#8217;s Gaza war with a response from its author, Richard Goldstone. I gave the debate to Goldstone on points: The original (congressional) resolution was almost infantile in its obfuscations. (Goldstone himself was not above a few obfuscations.)</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rkampeas@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-03T;06:40:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Awamori Shochu</title>
      <link>awamori.shochu@gmail.com</link>
      <description>&#8220;Please judge Goldstone, you should really be careful when such straight liars serve as the basis for your report. I am sure that you mean well but being an eye witness both to the events in Jenin and to the subsequent media and initial false UN reporting I do understand what happened to you. How a person of such stature and integrity could become associated with such a faulted report.


Look Judge Goldstone at your report on the Al Fakhura event on January 5&#45;6th 2009 (paragraphs 651&#45;688). You do report how Israel was accused for directly bombing the UNRWA school. It took 2 weeks to withdraw from this accusation but you, honored Judge, went back to get your testimony only from the same people who spread the blood libel of bombing the school.


Moreover when analyzing the scene you claim that you could not verify the numbers of 24 dead and 40 wounded but these numbers are not considered exaggerated. Finally in the Factual findings part you already determine that 24 people were killed and 40 injured!


Did you by any chance try to validate any of these invented and inciting details? Did you look at the Al Jazeera or BBC reports from the same very date of the event? Did you try to validate your &#8220;factual findings&#8221; conclusions by getting at least Emergency Room charts on the people admitted to their trauma department on this very day? Did you go over the I.D.&#8217;s of the &#8220;dead&#8221; people and the place or cemetery where they were supposedly buried?


Well you didn&#8217;t!&#8221;


http://soccerdad.baltiblogs.com/archives/2009/10/27/open_letter_to_judge_goldstone_a_judge_is_expected_to_look_at_least_for_some_evidence_and_verification.html</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Please judge Goldstone, you should really be careful when such straight liars serve as the basis for your report. I am sure that you mean well but being an eye witness both to the events in Jenin and to the subsequent media and initial false UN reporting I do understand what happened to you. How a person of such stature and integrity could become associated with such a faulted report.
</p>
<p>
Look Judge Goldstone at your report on the Al Fakhura event on January 5-6th 2009 (paragraphs 651-688). You do report how Israel was accused for directly bombing the UNRWA school. It took 2 weeks to withdraw from this accusation but you, honored Judge, went back to get your testimony only from the same people who spread the blood libel of bombing the school.
</p>
<p>
Moreover when analyzing the scene you claim that you could not verify the numbers of 24 dead and 40 wounded but these numbers are not considered exaggerated. Finally in the Factual findings part you already determine that 24 people were killed and 40 injured!
</p>
<p>
Did you by any chance try to validate any of these invented and inciting details? Did you look at the Al Jazeera or BBC reports from the same very date of the event? Did you try to validate your &#8220;factual findings&#8221; conclusions by getting at least Emergency Room charts on the people admitted to their trauma department on this very day? Did you go over the I.D.&#8217;s of the &#8220;dead&#8221; people and the place or cemetery where they were supposedly buried?
</p>
<p>
Well you didn&#8217;t!&#8221;
</p>
<p>
<a href="http://soccerdad.baltiblogs.com/archives/2009/10/27/open_letter_to_judge_goldstone_a_judge_is_expected_to_look_at_least_for_some_evidence_and_verification.html">http://soccerdad.baltiblogs.com/archives/2009/10/27/open_letter_to_judge_goldstone_a_judge_is_expected_to_look_at_least_for_some_evidence_and_verification.html</a>
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
