<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Richardson, not Kucinich/Paul</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/richardson-not-kucinich-paul/</link>
    <description>Knowing the difference between the two.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>aeden@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-09-24T;18:41:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by David</title>
      <link>david.ehrens@gmail.com</link>
      <description>Eden, who defends APN and JStreet in a previous post, in this one seems to be lumping people like Kucinich and Paul who believe that it&#8217;s time for the US to get out of the &#8220;empire business&#8221; or have a more America&#45;centric, even&#45;handed approach to Israel&#45;Palestine in with classical isolationists. Both of these guys are being quite consistent in calling for more talk, less saber&#45;ratting, even with Iran. And now comes along Bill Richardson saying the same thing PLUS correctly pointing out that solving the Israel&#45;Palestine issue will not help Iran solve the Afghanistan problem. Imagine the US and Iran reaching some kind of &#8220;I&#8217;d like to kill you but we have to agree on neutralizing the Taliban&#8221; agreement. This is NOT isolationism; it&#8217;s the kind of pragmatism that would have our Zionist friends reaching for their bottles of Pepcid and cursing America&#8217;s betrayal of a Middle East policy whose microscope is focused at 10,000X only on Israel.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eden, who defends APN and JStreet in a previous post, in this one seems to be lumping people like Kucinich and Paul who believe that it&#8217;s time for the US to get out of the &#8220;empire business&#8221; or have a more America-centric, even-handed approach to Israel-Palestine in with classical isolationists. Both of these guys are being quite consistent in calling for more talk, less saber-ratting, even with Iran. And now comes along Bill Richardson saying the same thing PLUS correctly pointing out that solving the Israel-Palestine issue will not help Iran solve the Afghanistan problem. Imagine the US and Iran reaching some kind of &#8220;I&#8217;d like to kill you but we have to agree on neutralizing the Taliban&#8221; agreement. This is NOT isolationism; it&#8217;s the kind of pragmatism that would have our Zionist friends reaching for their bottles of Pepcid and cursing America&#8217;s betrayal of a Middle East policy whose microscope is focused at 10,000X only on Israel.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-05-23T;03:01:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
