<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>ADL: Court made right decision in firefighter case</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/adl-court-made-right-decision-in-firefighter-case/</link>
    <description>The ADL notes that the high court used some of the arguments it made in a friend&#45;of&#45;the&#45;court brief in its decision on the Ricci case.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>efingerhut@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-06-29T;17:32:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Leland Madearis</title>
      <link>leland@twinvalley.net</link>
      <description>Los Angeles County Civil Service threw out  written promotional examinations in the 1960&#8217;s and came up with something called an &#8220;appraisal of promotability.&#8221;  A subjective  &#8220;opinion&#8221; by a board was weighted anywhere from five percent to one hundred percent of an applicants total score.&amp;nbsp; The more prepared and informed candidate was put behind the individual whose cultural experience was termed to be more valuable.&amp;nbsp; The felon or dropout was rewarded and the achiever was denied.&amp;nbsp; All this under the tent of politically agendized &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221;  The reason was to end run around the court action brought by minority groups.&amp;nbsp; &#123;black&#125;  The County fell into disarray,  the qualified applicants [black and white] went elsewhere,  the tax payer was cheated and the state is in bankruptcy and ruin.&amp;nbsp; All this similar to the plight of the Connecticut fire department.&amp;nbsp; Sotomayor ruled incorrectly on this.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Los Angeles County Civil Service threw out  written promotional examinations in the 1960&#8217;s and came up with something called an &#8220;appraisal of promotability.&#8221;  A subjective  &#8220;opinion&#8221; by a board was weighted anywhere from five percent to one hundred percent of an applicants total score.&nbsp; The more prepared and informed candidate was put behind the individual whose cultural experience was termed to be more valuable.&nbsp; The felon or dropout was rewarded and the achiever was denied.&nbsp; All this under the tent of politically agendized &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221;  The reason was to end run around the court action brought by minority groups.&nbsp; &#123;black&#125;  The County fell into disarray,  the qualified applicants [black and white] went elsewhere,  the tax payer was cheated and the state is in bankruptcy and ruin.&nbsp; All this similar to the plight of the Connecticut fire department.&nbsp; Sotomayor ruled incorrectly on this.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T;15:25:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>