<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Goin&#8217; all Old Testament on Gary Trudeau&#8217;s behind</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/goin-all-old-testament-on-gary-trudeaus-behind/</link>
    <description>Over at the comments section at Doonesbury.com, there is much pained consideration by fans of this Sunday&#8217;s strip which manages to raise two classical anti&#45;Jewish tropes in just six panels (most papers drop the first two panels:) The &amp;quot;Old Testament&amp;quot; God is vengeful, as opposed to the loving New Testament God; and the bad guys, the truly hateful villains, are the moneylenders.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rkampeas@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-06-01T;07:41:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jerome Whitson</title>
      <link>drrmmann@yahoo.com</link>
      <description>Trudeau is way out of line.


The Sunday strip on the Bible can only be considered purposefully misleading about the Jewish religion and the &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; testaments.&amp;nbsp; It isn&#8217;t even funny, and it isn&#8217;t timely, except to link the current bank and economy problems to the &#8220;moneylenders&#8221; (not the bankers, notice.)  


I have read Doonesbury since the beginning.&amp;nbsp; Trudeau has never been very good to the Jews.&amp;nbsp; The only  regular Jewish character, who wasn&#8217;t always identified very clearly as Jewish, was &#8220;Megaphone&#8221; Mark Slackmeyer, a rich, obnoxious loudmouth kid.


And when Trudeau needed a gay character, who did he &#8220;convert?&#8221;  Yep, Slackmeyer, who somehow only discovered he was gay at what, age 55?

While Trudeau is gay&#45;friendly, I still think it is interesting he has kept all the other major characters straight.&amp;nbsp; (Zonker Harris has never been interested in women, but he stays straight.)


Trudeau has been much kinder to WASPs, and in more recent times even to Blacks, with African&#45;Americans in the military, athletics, etc.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trudeau is way out of line.
</p>
<p>
The Sunday strip on the Bible can only be considered purposefully misleading about the Jewish religion and the &#8220;old&#8221; and &#8220;new&#8221; testaments.&nbsp; It isn&#8217;t even funny, and it isn&#8217;t timely, except to link the current bank and economy problems to the &#8220;moneylenders&#8221; (not the bankers, notice.)  
</p>
<p>
I have read Doonesbury since the beginning.&nbsp; Trudeau has never been very good to the Jews.&nbsp; The only  regular Jewish character, who wasn&#8217;t always identified very clearly as Jewish, was &#8220;Megaphone&#8221; Mark Slackmeyer, a rich, obnoxious loudmouth kid.
</p>
<p>
And when Trudeau needed a gay character, who did he &#8220;convert?&#8221;  Yep, Slackmeyer, who somehow only discovered he was gay at what, age 55?
<br />
While Trudeau is gay-friendly, I still think it is interesting he has kept all the other major characters straight.&nbsp; (Zonker Harris has never been interested in women, but he stays straight.)
</p>
<p>
Trudeau has been much kinder to WASPs, and in more recent times even to Blacks, with African-Americans in the military, athletics, etc.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Rabbi Arie Chark</title>
      <link>info@jedu.org</link>
      <description>I will comment to Doonebury or Slate or whomsoever. But first let me comment to you:


What do they need to be called on?


American bankers and the faith Christian administrators who &#8220;regulated&#8221; them depleted capital from the world economy and perpetrated a massive fraud on the US economy. Where is the anti&#45;Jewish rhetoric in pointing that out?!


As to the vengeful so&#45;called &#8220;Old Testament&#8221; G!d&#8212;It&#8217;s not an old Testament to Jews&#8212;yes, I agree, that rhetoric is old and tired.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will comment to Doonebury or Slate or whomsoever. But first let me comment to you:
</p>
<p>
What do they need to be called on?
</p>
<p>
American bankers and the faith Christian administrators who &#8220;regulated&#8221; them depleted capital from the world economy and perpetrated a massive fraud on the US economy. Where is the anti-Jewish rhetoric in pointing that out?!
</p>
<p>
As to the vengeful so-called &#8220;Old Testament&#8221; G!d&#8212;It&#8217;s not an old Testament to Jews&#8212;yes, I agree, that rhetoric is old and tired.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
