<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>NCJW defends Pelosi, is disappointed in Obama</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/ncjw-defends-pelosi-is-disappointed-in-obama/</link>
    <description>Earlier this week, Agudath Israel asked Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to repudiate her statement that funding birth control reduces government costs, which came in response to a question about why the economic stimulus bill included language allowing states to expand Medicaid family planning coverage without going through a waiver process. The National Council of Jewish Women said Pelosi was absolutely stating that &amp;quot;giving women control over their own fertility is not only a moral good, it is sound economics.&amp;quot; The organization is also disappointed with Obama for asking for the elimination of that family planning provision in the economic stimulus bill. Here&#8217;s NCJW president Nancy Ratzan&#8217;s response to Agudath Israel and the president:</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>efingerhut@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-01-29T;21:46:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Michael G. Dworkin</title>
      <link>dworkinmg@msn.com</link>
      <description>Whatever the merits of enhanced family planning efforts may be they haven&#8217;t got a damn thing to do with stimulating the economy and reducing unamployment now.


 As a professional economist, I am particularly annoyed at the NCJW and others of their ilk who are piling on their agendas in the name of &#8220;economic stimulus.&#8221; This is just one of many more &#8220;bridges to nowhere.&#8221;


It is NOT the new beginning the President had in mind. It&#8217;s the same old BS.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever the merits of enhanced family planning efforts may be they haven&#8217;t got a damn thing to do with stimulating the economy and reducing unamployment now.
</p>
<p>
 As a professional economist, I am particularly annoyed at the NCJW and others of their ilk who are piling on their agendas in the name of &#8220;economic stimulus.&#8221; This is just one of many more &#8220;bridges to nowhere.&#8221;
</p>
<p>
It is NOT the new beginning the President had in mind. It&#8217;s the same old BS.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2012-02-10T;12:44:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
