
Debating J Street and Soros
What's the fallout for J Street after acknowledging that it has been receiving major funding from George Soros -- and fudging the facts about doing so?
The reporter who broke the story, Eli Lake of The Washington Times, has a story headlined "Jewish group falls from favor at White House":
The White House appears to be distancing itself from the liberal advocacy group J Street that it once embraced as its envoy to the U.S. Jewish community after disclosures that nearly half the group's funding for 2008 came from a single Hong Kong donor.
White House spokesman Thomas Vietor declined to comment when asked on Monday if the White House would continue its past practice of inviting J Street's leaders to take part in conference calls with senior White House officials and to other White House events, and whether senior Obama administration officials would take part in future J Street conferences.
Retired Marine Corps Gen. James L. Jones, President Obama's national security adviser, was the keynote speaker at J Street's inaugural convention in 2009. At the convention, he said: "You can be sure this administration will be represented at all future conferences."
Feels like a stretch. Let's see what happens the next there is a conference call or a J Street convention.
Along the same lines, Jennifer Rubin of Commentary seems to be jumping the gun in suggesting that the Jewish establishment has somehow shifted over all this. Judging from Lake's article (which is the one Rubin points to), we're at the same place we've always been: Malcolm Hoenlein (head of the Conference Presidents of Major American Jewish Organization) thinks J Street is bad -- and has the guts to say so publicly; Rabbi Steve Gutow (of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs) disagrees -- and he has the guts to say so:
Malcolm Hoenlein, executive vice chairman of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, said Monday that The Times story was important because it exposed how Mr. Soros was funding J Street despite previous denials from the group.
Mr. Ben Ami has not said he lied. He did, however, state in a note to supporters on Sunday: "I accept responsibility personally for being less than clear about Mr. Soros' support once he did become a donor."
Mr. Hoenlein said "this is further evidence of the duplicity that they have manifested all along, portraying themselves as something they are not, and engaging in attacks against others when they should have been taking care of their own house."
"I certainly think it was wrong that they did not talk about Soros from the beginning," said Rabbi Steve Gutow, president of the Jewish Council for Public Affairs.
"I don't think this is the end of J Street, though. From my experience, they have been very helpful. When the divestment campaign was in full swing at Berkeley, J Street weighed in effectively in opposition to the effort to get the university to divest from Israel," he said.
UPDATE: A source associated with J Street tells me 80 of the group's leaders met Tuesday with Israel's ambassador to the United States, Michael Oren, and officials at the State Department.
2 Comments
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
I don’t understand the uproar over George Soros supporting J Street. I read that this one and that one expressed an opinion this way or that way, followed by the implication that this was an act of bravery or at least bravado.
When Sheldon Adelman financed a rightwing group like “Im Tirtzu” which attacked the right of professors and other academics to expressed opinions the “Im Tirtzu” people decided were not quite “kosher,” there was no uproar over Adelman, a man who has shown his ability to support rightwing groups in Israel, which probably are regarded by him as doing a “Mitzvah.”
So if George Soros doesn’t use that vocabulary, he probably believes that handing some cash over to a liberally-oriented group like J-Street is also the equivalent of a mitzvah.
I believe that some people are just too ready to make everyone who doesn’t agree with him a “post-Zionist” if not an anti-Semite. I happen to believe that the playing field on which Jews can express their beliefs is a little broader than that.
Jerry Blaz
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.
Already a JTA member?
Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!
Share



JSS
09/28/10 05:44 PM
QUESTION?
Is anyone truly surprised that Soros=J Street=Obama?.
What kind of Jews are affiliated with an entity like J Street, whose leader, one Mr Ben-Ami, over the weekend, blamed the IRS for lawfully revealing the “highly secret” soros
j street financial nexus?
How many members of J Street have ever visited Israel, and witnessed first hand the Jewish Homeland’s peril and military preparedness 24/7?
Soros is a Hungarian survivor of the HOLOCAUST who is a self-proclaimed atheist.
Recently soros was quoted as referring to Israel as a place that he “just” didn’t want anything to do with.
Rather, he gives his fortune away to groups that are outed as being ANTI ISRAEL, including his recent $100 mil to an NGO whose pattern is condemnation and consistent attacks on a secure sovereign Israel.
The nascent 2 year old J Street made no secret of its access to the highest levels of the current administration, publicly relishing that they are the “liason” for Jews today to Pres Obama.
Pres Obama is the most hostile-sitting US president in the history of the state of Israel.
J Street accomodated one (Ret) Gen’l Jas Jones, a recognized leading arabist in the present administration whose actions have been ANTI ISRAEL and pro Muslim for decades.
J Street is the first to publicly condemn Israel, whether it concerns a Gaza-bound flotilla full of terrorists or accepting the biased UN’s Goldstone findings.
J Street is neither peaceful nor supportive of an Israel where Jews can live safely.