JTA: The Global News Service of the Jewish People

Top Reform rabbi: Freeze building in ‘East Jerusalem’

Rabbi Eric Yoffie, president of the Union for Reform Judaism, the largest synagogue movement in the county, is calling on Israel to enact a construction freeze in parts of Jerusalem.

He issued the call during remarks to rabbis and members of URJ's board of trustees on Thursday:

The Union for Reform Judaism, like most American Jewish organizations, supports a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. This means that we believe housing units constructed in Jerusalem by Israel are not settlements and they are not illegal. But a great many things that are legal are not prudent or wise – and building in Arab sections of Jerusalem in the current political climate is one of those things. 

This decision to build in eastern Jerusalem is one that is not supported by any Israeli ally, including the United States and Canada. I see no reason why Israel should renounce her claim to all of Jerusalem as Israel’s eternal capital, or her right to build anywhere within Jerusalem’s borders. But there are many reasons why Israel should consider a temporary moratorium on all such building. Such a step would strengthen relations with the United States at a moment when those relations have been frayed; it would be greeted enthusiastically by other strong and loyal allies, such as Canada, that were angered by Israel’s recent action; it would demonstrate a firm commitment on Israel’s part to the American-sponsored peace negotiations; and it would, potentially, breathe life into those negotiations and turn the attention back to where it is most needed -- moving forward to a lasting, meaningful peace. Nothing should divert us from this goal.

Here's the text of the full text of his remarks:

Good afternoon. This has been a difficult and complicated time for us as American Jews. We have a number of mandates at the moment: We proclaim our love for Israel in unmistakable terms, and we work to prevent the current situation from spiraling out of control and causing a deep rift between Israel and the United States.

The words of Vice President Biden last week at Tel Aviv University were heartening to all lovers of Israel. The Vice President expressed, in unequivocal language, the commitment of the American administration to Israel’s security and well-being. “There is absolutely no space,” he said, “between the United States and Israel when it comes to security -- none.” 

The general approach of the Reform movement to issues of peace is the same as that of all recent American administrations: We remain committed to an Israel that is Jewish and democratic, we affirm our commitment to a two-state solution, and we support an active American role in the peace process.

Current tensions are not about a two-state solution, which is accepted by Israel. Nor are they simply about diplomatic courtesy. There is also a substantive question of great importance that needs to be addressed: Should Israel continue to build now in East Jerusalem? I believe that it should not.

The announcement by the Jerusalem District Planning Committee of its intention to construct 1,600 new housing units in East Jerusalem was a serious miscalculation, leading to condemnation of the decision by Vice President Biden and Secretary of State Clinton. Most American Jews join with our government and others in the Jewish community in noting that this announcement by Israel was an error, particularly disturbing at a time when progress on peace talks appears to be possible. Prime Minister Netanyahu is to be applauded for his prompt expression of regret over the timing of the announcement. 

We recognize that compromise will be necessary to reach a solution and achieve a final peace agreement. We expect that the three major settlement blocks will remain a part of Israel and naturally expect that, under a final status agreement, Palestinians fully accept the state of Israel and her right to exist.

Jerusalem, however, poses different issues. The Union for Reform Judaism, like most American Jewish organizations, supports a united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty. This means that we believe housing units constructed in Jerusalem by Israel are not settlements and they are not illegal. But a great many things that are legal are not prudent or wise – and building in Arab sections of Jerusalem in the current political climate is one of those things. 

This decision to build in eastern Jerusalem is one that is not supported by any Israeli ally, including the United States and Canada. I see no reason why Israel should renounce her claim to all of Jerusalem as Israel’s eternal capital, or her right to build anywhere within Jerusalem’s borders. But there are many reasons why Israel should consider a temporary moratorium on all such building. Such a step would strengthen relations with the United States at a moment when those relations have been frayed; it would be greeted enthusiastically by other strong and loyal allies, such as Canada, that were angered by Israel’s recent action; it would demonstrate a firm commitment on Israel’s part to the American-sponsored peace negotiations; and it would, potentially, breathe life into those negotiations and turn the attention back to where it is most needed -- moving forward to a lasting, meaningful peace. Nothing should divert us from this goal.

If a peace agreement becomes a real, viable possibility, Israel will likely be prepared and willing to compromise in a fundamental way on Jerusalem. We saw this a decade ago when Israelis, under Prime Minister Ehud Barak, faced the very real possibility of peace in the near future and were willing to make far-reaching concessions. If peace were truly to become possible, we would expect this to happen again -- but first, peace talks must begin. 

We do not know if the talks that are soon to begin will generate positive momentum toward peace, but the governments of the United States and Israel have expressed hope that they will. Surely no opportunity to move toward an enduring settlement must be squandered. I hope that the government of Israel will see the declaration of a temporary moratorium on building in East Jerusalem as a means of seizing the initiative, deepening her ties with America, rallying her allies around the world, and challenging the Palestinians and Arab world to come forward with confidence-building steps of their own.

  • Share Share
  • Share on Google+ Google+
  • Share on Facebook Facebook

Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments

03/19/10 08:17 PM

Yoffie should move to Israel, pay taxes, serve in the IDF or SHUT UP!

03/19/10 08:18 PM

I agree with Rabbi Eric Yoffie that Israel should not build any houses in East Jerusalem.
Israel’s plan to do so has enraged the United States—Israeli-U.S. relations are currently the worst they have been in four decades—and has derailed peace talks with the Palestinians.
Israel must consider the long-term ramifications that this construction would have in achieving peace and harmony with its Arab neighbors, in addition to maintaining a friendly relationship with the United States.

03/19/10 08:24 PM

I do not understand the need for Rabbi Yoffie to come out with a public statement against the actions of Israel. “‘There is also a substantive question of great importance that needs to be addressed: Should Israel continue to build now in East Jerusalem? I believe that it should not,’ Yoffie said.” First, with all due respect tothe rabbinates of all Jewish denominations, Rabbis have no business sounding off in political arenas.  What is the purpose - self-importance? showing that Jews support the US? Second, it is a broad brushstroke approach - always Israel must compromise… . Third, these housing units were approved years ago - this neighborhood already exists, there is even a “770” Chabad building in Ramat Shlomo. This area was the quarry for the huge stones used to build the Temple.  Yet, the Palestinians refuse to even acknowledge that there was a Jewish presence - a Temple, a Jewish kingdom, a Land of Israel.  It is always Israel that must “compromise.” Let the P.A. take steps to condemn and discontinue the hate-education which calls on little Palestinian children to recapture occupied Palestine and get rid of the Jews. Maybe then there could be the beginnings or a move toward peace and acceptance.

03/19/10 08:28 PM

Cudos to Steven Glueck and his post. I can’t believe that a Jewish “leader” would call any part of Jerusalem “Arab”. So Hadassah Hospital and Hebrew University are in Arab Jerusalem? And has Rabbi Yoffie looked at a map lately to see where Ramat Shlomo is?

03/19/10 08:29 PM

Sorry for the typo—kudos nevertheless.

03/19/10 08:33 PM

It is NOT even “East Jerusalem.”

That fact alone gives you some indication of the arrogance, ignorance and malice behind their idiotic posturing.
http://mysticalpaths.blogspot.com/2010/03/east-jerusalem-check-your-directions.html

03/19/10 08:42 PM

What leaders such as Rabbi Yoffe should be calling for is geography lessons for the vice-President and this entire administration.  And then those lessons could be followed up by some history lessons!

When in history have any concessions made by Israel ever lead to anything but more concessions made by Israel?  Nothing the Jewish State has ever given in on during the last 60 years has moved the peace processes forward.  The only thing that eveer moved negotiations forward has been when Israel has been in a position of overwhelming strength--a position from which to threaten her neighbors.  It is sad, but true.

For Yoffie to call the building of apartments in a Jewish neighborhood a substantial issue is ridiculous.  Bombing civilians is a substantial issue.  Honor killings and cross border smuggling of illegal weapons are substantial issues.  Get your priorities straight, Rabbi!

03/19/10 08:53 PM

Rabbi Yoffie mistakes the denomination he is in: he is not a Rebbe of the Hasidic persuasion;no one really cares what he chooses to opine about. The fact that he doesn’t know either geography, negotiating theory or can recognize what the true problem is with respect to Israel and the Palestinians, makes his opinion less valuable than someone who does not reflexively parrot the Democratic and Leftist position.

My own experience with the Reform movement ( thankfully at an end since my children are grown ) is that its rabbis are political ( and monochromatic, at that ) and believe that “social justice” equates to Judaism, as they see it. Is it the reflexive leftism or pique at Israel viewing Reform Judaism as less than mainstream? I am old enough to recall that the Reform movement did not even endorse Israel in its earliest days. Israel and Jewish continuity need rabbis like Yoffie as much as they need J Street.

03/19/10 08:59 PM

It is mind-boggling and truly shameful that a Jewish leader attacks perfectly legitimate Israeli policy and remains silent about the outrageous actions of Israel’s sworn enemies.  Rabbi Yoffie should be condemning the Palestinian Authority’s ceremony last week naming a public square in Ramallah after terrorist Dalal Mugrabi, who murdered 38 Jews, including 13 children, and wounded 71 more.  And Yoffie should condemn the rockets launched from Gaza which fell on Israel today, killing one person.  And Yoffie should display some real courage - and attack the Obama administration’s criticism of Israel for building needed homes in its own capital. 

LizBerneyforCongress.com

03/19/10 09:17 PM

The settlement issue is just the Arabs excuse du jour.  Paying credence to this is avoiding the true issue that the only offer the Arabs are willing to accept is a full migration due west for Israeli Jews.  Not only are geography and history lessons are need by the Obama clan - they could use some help in the reality department.  Since ‘48, the Israeli government has made many offers to the Palestinians who happened to remain in the area (which was against the instruction of their then leaders), whose leadership at worst scoffed at or at best walked away from such offers.  Maybe a good starting point to realistically get the peace process moving would be for Mitchell/Clinton/Obama to let the Palestinians know that until they can 1) recognize Israel right to exist and 2) denounce (and enforce) the use of terrorism against the citizens of the country referred to previously - there is nothing to talk about.

Leave a Comment

To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.

Already a JTA member?

I forgot my password

Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!