
Cramming in for the blogger panel
During lunch on Monday, about 50 attendees at the J Street conference moved into a smaller room for a panel discussion among bloggers who sound off on the Israeli-Palestinian issue. Some had to sit on the floor and stand against the wall in order to cram in for the session, with a dozen bloggers running the gamut from two-state solution supporters to anti-Zionists.
The bloggers and J Street officials insisted that it was not part of the official program, but J Street executive director Jeremy Ben-Ami did drop by for a few minutes to listen.
It was run by liberal bloggers Richard Silverstein, who authors Tikkun Olam, and Jerry Haber, the creator of The Magnes Zionist.
Some of those on the panel voiced disappointment with Ben-Ami's interview last week with The Atlantic's Jeffrey Goldberg, in which the J Street leader said he hoped to get attacked from the left and compared John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt's book "The Israel Lobby'" to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion."
The most vocal about his disappointment, and the most obnoxious about it, was Max Blumenthal, who was last seen videotaping drunk American college students in Jerusalem acting like drunk American college students -- and passing them off as representative of Israel. (It turns out that Israel is a much freer place for videographers than the bloggers' planel).
Blumenthal mocked Goldberg as a "serious man" and said that if Ben-Ami couldn't stand up to Goldberg, "how can we trust you to stand up against the settlers or Netanyahu and Lieberman?"
He then said Elie Wiesel, who appeared at Pastor John Hagee's Night to Honor Israel on Sunday evening, had spent the weekend speaking to an "anti-Semitic group," and that the last time Wiesel had "trusted someone so much it was Bernard Madoff."
Others were more civil. Sydney Levy, who writes the Muzzlewatch blog for Jewish Voice for Peace, said he wasn't that bothered by Ben-Ami's statement that he was hoping to be attacked by JVP.
"We are not interested in attacking J Street or not attacking J Streeet," he said. When they do good things, he said, "we will say so."
The panel included Laila El-Haddad, who blogs as Gaza Mom and identified herself as a "one-stater." She said that many Palestinians felt similarly and a one-state solution "needs to be added to the discussion."
But also participating, via the Internet, was Palestinian-American Ray Hanania, who said the Goldstone report "shouldn't be used as a battering ram" by Palestinians against Israel but should be a "battering ram against injustice."
The most amusing portion of the 90 minutes -- and one illustration of how these issues are now fought out on the Internet -- came when blogger Dan Sieradski asked a questioner to repeat his query. Why? Because Sieradski had been distracted by -- and combating -- someone on Twitter trying to pose as him (with a one letter difference in his screen name) and tweeting negative messages about the J Street conference.
The most passionate part of the discussion, though, might have been when Haber talked about why he blogs about the Israeli-Palestinian issue.
"It's to vent and express our pain," he said, adding that "you might as well ask why I breathe."
Blogging "allows people who care to retain their sanity," he said. "You do it because you have to do it."
2 Comments
Share This
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
Blumenthal Lets It Slip: Jeffrey Goldberg catches Max Blumenthal telling a nugget of truth at J Street about the authors of the Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy.
http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/10/blumenthal-lets-it-slip.html#links
Dear Ray,
“Discourse and discussion are Democratic principles if applied properly in the Middle East—in israel and the Arab World—would have encouraged peace long ago.” Unlike and unlikely in the “Arab World” where discourse does not exist, Israel has a press that in it’s lack of national responsibility, exceeds all standards. The J Street conference in it’s physically removing those it disagrees with or shouting them down, could certainly feel welcome in any non-democratic forum.
Leave a Comment
To comment on this article, you must first be registered with JTA.
Not Registered?
There are real advantages to a FREE registration with JTA.org:
- Make your voice heard through comments on articles
- Receive our e-mailed Daily Briefing, an invaluable quick-read
- Help decide what Jewish news matters most with interactive tools
Register Now
Already a JTA member?
Not registered? Sign up now. It's fast and it's free.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Bill Pearlman on The power of example -- the NIF, the attacks, and Goldstone
- david bedein on The power of example -- the NIF, the attacks, and Goldstone
- david bedein on The power of example -- the NIF, the attacks, and Goldstone
- Jeremiah Haber on The power of example -- the NIF, the attacks, and Goldstone
- Jeremiah Haber on The power of example -- the NIF, the attacks, and Goldstone



Ray Hanania
10/27/09 07:13 PM
One minor correction (and not a criticism of your story). I said the Goldstone report should not be used as a battering ram against Israel, but as a “battery ram against injustice.” It’s not your fault as the video connection occasionally had a few audio disruptions.
I believe that moderates Israelis and Jews, and moderate Palestinians and Arabs must work together to end the conflict, create two-states, speak out against violence, learn to accept criticism and engage in even passionate debate without hatred, and pursue a compromise that surely will involve pain for both sides.
We have no choice. We don’t even have to like each other. We only have to like peace, reject violence and work towards ending the conflict resulting in two sovereign states. If we can do that, there will be a genuine future for Israel and one for Palestine. If we can’t eventually, the fanatics on both sides will end up destroying everything on both sides. Neither side will survive.
thanks
Ray Hanania
http://www.RadioChicagoland.com