Deep thought
Would Chas Freeman's defenders really want him advising the White House about how to treat Iran post June 12 elections?
Here's Andrew Sullivan on Freeman;
Here's an example of Andrew Sullivan's relentless (and admirable) coverage of the protests;
And here's my round-up of Chas' views on pesky protesters in China and at home.
Andrew is hardly unique among influential A-listers who attacked any attempt to probe Freeman's views as "smears" and yet who for the last month have repudiated those views.
How do these reconcile? Really, not with irony? I'm seeking a little consistency here.
0 Comments
Share This
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
There are currently no comments to this article. Leave a comment below.
Leave a Comment
To comment on this article, you must first be registered with JTA.
Not Registered?
There are real advantages to a FREE registration with JTA.org:
- Make your voice heard through comments on articles
- Receive our e-mailed Daily Briefing, an invaluable quick-read
- Help decide what Jewish news matters most with interactive tools
Register Now
Already a JTA member?
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Bill Pearlman on NJDC:GOP must condemn "Tea Party" signs
- Ben Packer on Tidbits: AJC, J Street on Iranian ship, Hebron and the Mets
- steve ariza on Carter, facts and Jews
- steve ariza on Tidbits: AJC, J Street on Iranian ship, Hebron and the Mets
- Lori Lowenthal Marcus on Tidbits: AJC, J Street on Iranian ship, Hebron and the Mets
