
Jeffrey Goldberg: Learning to live with an Iranian bomb?
Michael J. Titten has a lengthy interview with Jeffrey Goldberg, in which Goldberg explains why he suspects the world will need "to learn to live with the Iranian bomb":
MJT: Here, I think, is the big question: what should be done about Iran’s nuclear weapons? Would it be better to use military action – whether it’s American, Israeli, or both – or learn to live with the Iranian bomb?
Goldberg: I suspect we are going to be learning to live with the Iranian bomb.
MJT: Is that a good idea?
Goldberg: No. It’s terrible. But also striking Iran would be terrible.
This is an interesting question right now, at this moment in history. This might be a place where American interests and Israeli interests diverge somewhat. I think the Iranian nuclear weapons program does pose an existential threat to Israel. It doesn’t pose an existential threat to America. It poses a unique set of terrible challenges for America, but it doesn’t mean our existence here is in peril. So it might not be in America’s best interests right now to strike militarily – for any number of reasons, including the fact that it might not work. And if it does work, it would almost seem to justify, in a way, Iran seeking nuclear weapons. And the program might continue.
The thing we hope for is that Iran moderates itself, that the people of Iran who are more moderate than its leaders figure out a way to moderate this. The problem isn’t whether or not Iran has the bomb, it’s whether or not the mullahs have the bomb.
MJT: Sure.
Goldberg: As I wrote in a New York Times op-ed a few weeks ago, there are two Israeli strategic doctrines in confrontation right now. The first is: never do anything that harms the strategic relationship with the United States of America. The second is: prevent, at all costs, the possibility of a Second Holocaust. What if these two things come into conflict?
I tend to think that [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu understands better than almost anyone else the imperative of maintaining a strong strategic relationship with the United States of America. But I also think he’s governed by his understanding of Jewish history.
If you are the de-facto leader of the Jews in a post-Holocaust world, what is the absolute worst thing you could do? Allow the formation of an existential threat to half the world’s remaining Jews. It’s a hard job.
Read the full interview.
4 Comments
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
No matter how you cut it. Iran with the bomb is not good for the world as it and NK can give bombs to others that can be used as leverage against the world. One has to do what needs to be done even if it means a war as it will happen. You can negotiate all you want but it comes down to Jerusalem and that is not divided b Israel so in the end war is inevitable.
iran and NK and Syria and others makes for a more dangerous place.
All sanctions are now useless too little and late.
It would be much easier just to bomb the head mullahs (better if Achmadinejad could be thrown in as a bonus. Still better if an attack is coordinated on the Republican Guard and the Basij (who seem to delight in beating Iranian protesters).
But the most brilliant stroke of intelligence would be to expose financial corruption by the powerful mullahs (if any exists; figure a 50-50 proposition).
It’s just possible that Iran’s mullahs aren’t mentally ill: the insanity that stares at you from their comments on Israel, for example, may be just acting. They don’t need to actually use the bomb against Israel: life will get intolerable in HaEretz, because people will be demoralized, knowing that their lives and their plans for themselves and their families can be cut short any moment. I believe that the Jewish people - at this juncture the people are the most important - and Netanyahu know this.
Leave a Comment
To leave a comment, you must first be logged in to JTA. If you are not registered, please click here.
Already a JTA member?
Need to know? Get JTA's free e-newsletters!
Share



David Sternlight
07/10/09 04:07 PM
“Serious experts who are not Israelis look at the Middle East and say that if Iran is nuclear in 2015, the Middle East will be nuclear in 2020. And a multi-nuclear Middle East is a nightmare - five or six nuclear states in a jumpy and unstable region. “
Uzi Arad, Head of Israel’s National Security Council.