<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>The growth of the nonprofit sector</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/the-growth-of-the-nonprofit-sector/</link>
    <description>Stephanie Strom has an interesting story in the Times about the seemingly unregulated growth of nonprofits in the U.S. over the past 10 years. Over the past decade, the number of nonprofits have grown by 60 percent, to some 1.1 million, reports Strom, which cost the federal government some $50 billion in tax revenue.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>jberkman@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-12-08T;22:19:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jacob Berkman</title>
      <link>jberkman@jta.org</link>
      <description>Thanks Shawn..thanks for the clarification. I made the correction.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Shawn..thanks for the clarification. I made the correction.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2011-02-25T;01:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by David</title>
      <link>david@jfunders.org</link>
      <description>Jacob, 


This doesn&#8217;t change most of the basic point, but if I remember right, the growth figure and the total # isn&#8217;t really valid because there&#8217;s no regular scouring of the rolls to get rid of nonprofits that close/fold/merge/weren&#8217;t real in the first place. So a lot of stuff just accumulates on the registry and shows up in these counts even though it&#8217;s completely inactive and has been for years.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, 
</p>
<p>
This doesn&#8217;t change most of the basic point, but if I remember right, the growth figure and the total # isn&#8217;t really valid because there&#8217;s no regular scouring of the rolls to get rid of nonprofits that close/fold/merge/weren&#8217;t real in the first place. So a lot of stuff just accumulates on the registry and shows up in these counts even though it&#8217;s completely inactive and has been for years.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2011-02-25T;01:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by J. Shawn Landres</title>
      <link>shawn@jewishjumpstart.org</link>
      <description>Jacob, you raise an important point; not only do we need to be focused on what is necessary, but we also need to ensure that we&#8217;re managing necessary resources as effectively as possible. Much of the Innovation Ecosystem report (available at http://jewishecoystem.org) focuses on innovators&#8217; desire to share resources and streamline processes. The Community Partners/Jumpstart Project Partnership (http://projectpartnership.org) and J Space (http://jspace&#45;la.org) are two of a number of responses to that need.&amp;nbsp; Makom Hadash in New York, JHub in London, and the PresenTense Hub in Jerusalem also are working to share resources and benefit from creative synergies.


One important correction and an equally important clarification on your story, though:


The correction: It&#8217;s not 230 organizations.&amp;nbsp; Based on the 2008 Survey of New Jewish Organizations, we estimated that there were 300&#45;325 such startups (not 230); the $500 million overall investment and $100&#45;110 million 2008 investment figures apply to that larger estimate.&amp;nbsp; We also estimated that these organizations were reaching 360,000&#45;400,000 people, of whom 100,000&#45;150,000 may have no other connection to the organized Jewish community.&amp;nbsp; If we take Mark Pearlman&#8217;s $10 billion estimate of the &#8220;Jewish GDP&#8221; and assume an American Jewish population of 6 million, we find that these startups are reaching ~7% of the population with only ~1% of the money. So that&#8217;s pretty effective already.


The clarification: Stephanie Strom&#8217;s story, which focuses on independent tax&#45;exempt 501(c)(3) organizations.&amp;nbsp; That category of nonprofit accounts for only 56% of the startups in our sample (45% required to file a 990 tax return and another 11% not required to file a 990). The remaining  44% in the sample are independent religious groups, unincorporated associations, independent corporations with fiscal agents, and autonomous managed projects/programs attached to a larger entity.&amp;nbsp; So if you want to compare apples to apples, we&#8217;d say there are about 185&#45;200 startups of the specific type that Strom was describing.


Obviously this was the first time ever that anyone had run a survey like ours, and we&#8217;re planning to initiate the 2010 Survey of New Jewish Organizations beginning early next year. That will give us new data with which to compare the 2008 material, and should help us get more clarity on what&#8217;s happening in the field.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob, you raise an important point; not only do we need to be focused on what is necessary, but we also need to ensure that we&#8217;re managing necessary resources as effectively as possible. Much of the Innovation Ecosystem report (available at <a href="http://jewishecoystem.org">http://jewishecoystem.org</a>) focuses on innovators&#8217; desire to share resources and streamline processes. The Community Partners/Jumpstart Project Partnership (<a href="http://projectpartnership.org">http://projectpartnership.org</a>) and J Space (<a href="http://jspace-la.org">http://jspace-la.org</a>) are two of a number of responses to that need.&nbsp; Makom Hadash in New York, JHub in London, and the PresenTense Hub in Jerusalem also are working to share resources and benefit from creative synergies.
</p>
<p>
One important correction and an equally important clarification on your story, though:
</p>
<p>
The correction: It&#8217;s not 230 organizations.&nbsp; Based on the 2008 Survey of New Jewish Organizations, we estimated that there were 300-325 such startups (not 230); the $500 million overall investment and $100-110 million 2008 investment figures apply to that larger estimate.&nbsp; We also estimated that these organizations were reaching 360,000-400,000 people, of whom 100,000-150,000 may have no other connection to the organized Jewish community.&nbsp; If we take Mark Pearlman&#8217;s $10 billion estimate of the &#8220;Jewish GDP&#8221; and assume an American Jewish population of 6 million, we find that these startups are reaching ~7% of the population with only ~1% of the money. So that&#8217;s pretty effective already.
</p>
<p>
The clarification: Stephanie Strom&#8217;s story, which focuses on independent tax-exempt 501(c)(3) organizations.&nbsp; That category of nonprofit accounts for only 56% of the startups in our sample (45% required to file a 990 tax return and another 11% not required to file a 990). The remaining  44% in the sample are independent religious groups, unincorporated associations, independent corporations with fiscal agents, and autonomous managed projects/programs attached to a larger entity.&nbsp; So if you want to compare apples to apples, we&#8217;d say there are about 185-200 startups of the specific type that Strom was describing.
</p>
<p>
Obviously this was the first time ever that anyone had run a survey like ours, and we&#8217;re planning to initiate the 2010 Survey of New Jewish Organizations beginning early next year. That will give us new data with which to compare the 2008 material, and should help us get more clarity on what&#8217;s happening in the field.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2011-02-25T;01:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
