<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>UJC: Campaign pledges are down</title>
    <link>http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/ujc-campaign-numbers-are-down/</link>
    <description>The UJC has new numbers showing that federation fund raising held steady in 2008&#45;2009, but pledges so far this year are down.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>jberkman@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-07-01T;00:19:02-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jacob Berkman</title>
      <link>jberkman@jta.org</link>
      <description>Jonathan: I find that comment interesting. The data on the drop in canadian dollars was not my own analysis. That was given to me by the UJC, a fact that they also report on their Web site. Do you think the UJC is picking at the Canadian federations?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan: I find that comment interesting. The data on the drop in canadian dollars was not my own analysis. That was given to me by the UJC, a fact that they also report on their Web site. Do you think the UJC is picking at the Canadian federations?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2011-02-25T;01:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Comment by Jonathan</title>
      <link>jonathon.ament@gmail.com</link>
      <description>You&#8217;re comparing apples to oranges with the Canadian numbers.


The 2007 figures include Toronto&#8217;s special Israel Emergency Campaign, which was counted as part of the regular campaign.


While the overall &#8220;regular&#8221; Canadian campaign dollars might have dropped between 2007 and 2008, even if it did it&#8217;s nowhere near as great as this article suggests.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re comparing apples to oranges with the Canadian numbers.
</p>
<p>
The 2007 figures include Toronto&#8217;s special Israel Emergency Campaign, which was counted as part of the regular campaign.
</p>
<p>
While the overall &#8220;regular&#8221; Canadian campaign dollars might have dropped between 2007 and 2008, even if it did it&#8217;s nowhere near as great as this article suggests.
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2011-02-25T;01:28:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>
