
Washington Post rounds up the Bernie books
The Washington Post also has a roundup of three of the recently released Madoff books, “too Good to be True by Erin Arvedlund, “Betrayal” by Andrew Kirtzman and Madoff With the Money by Jerry Oppenheimer.
The combined review of the three books recounts some of the tales that each of the books share, like the false book report Bernie gave in the tenth grade.
But for me the review is interesting insofar as it gives a little insight into a lot of the folks who invested with Madoff:
"We thought he was a god; we trusted everything in his hands," said Elie Wiesel, the Holocaust survivor and Nobel laureate whose foundation lost $15 million when Madoff's scheme
collapsed. In a panel discussion in Manhattan, Wiesel called Madoff a "liar" and a "swindler" and a "scoundrel," but explained that "there was a myth that he created around him, that everything was so special, so unique, that it had to be secret. It was like a mystical mythology that nobody could understand."
Madoff carefully nurtured that mythology, his "velvet rope" image: Not just anyone could invest with him. "Bernie was the Studio 54 of money managers," Oppenheimer quips. He constantly turned down eager investors. The fund was closed, he'd say, or he would insist on a $2 million minimum.
The irony is that Ponzi schemes live off a steady stream of cash; old investors are paid off with fresh funds from new investors. But playing hard-to-get worked. "There's nothing that sounds more exclusive than saying you don't need someone's money," a banker told Arvedlund. "That was his shtick. He would rope them in, taking a small amount of money at first, and then hundreds of millions."
Investors, who included relatives and employees, routinely ignored the red flags that in hindsight seem so evident: Madoff's insistence that no one disclose their business relationship with him; his less-than-top-notch accounting firm, a one-man operation working out of a strip mall 45 minutes outside New York; and most of all, those insane returns, consistently reaching double digits and sometimes hitting 18 to 20 percent, year after year. The regularity of those bogus returns made Madoff seem like a safe investment; some called him the "Jewish T-bill."
1 Comment
Share This
madoff,
Madoff
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
Leave a Comment
To comment on this article, you must first be registered with JTA.
Not Registered?
There are real advantages to a FREE registration with JTA.org:
- Make your voice heard through comments on articles
- Receive our e-mailed Daily Briefing, an invaluable quick-read
- Help decide what Jewish news matters most with interactive tools
Register Now
Already a JTA member?
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- steve ariza on Rebranding Leonid Nevzlin
- steve ariza on Sharansky unplugged: Jewish Agency chairman sits down with The Fundermentalist
- steve ariza on Sharansky unplugged: Jewish Agency chairman sits down with The Fundermentalist
- steve ariza on Sharansky unplugged: Jewish Agency chairman sits down with The Fundermentalist
- steve ariza on JPost: Israeli govern to give Jewish Agency cash for budget, and JAFI to hold meetings in St. Pete




A Hordish
08/31/09 03:40 PM
let Iran have a walk on the nuclear threat is bombastic. They have had a Jewish involvement for the last 100 years, that was meaningful and productive, they squandered and deteriated any meaningful dialogue, they are a lost cause. Of course there are many moderates who can over turn the stupidity of their leadership. Bombing their nuclear facilities is a piece of cake, do it and enjoy the dessert. Let the rest of the world worry about the consequences of arrogance and hippocracy