http://blogs.jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/dershowitz-went-too-far-in-slamming-goldstone/ Americans for Peace Now CEO Debra DeLee chastises Alan Dershowitz for his “character assassination” of Judge Richard Goldstone.  en-us jtamailbox@jta.org Copyright 2010 2010-02-07T;22:52:00-05:00 albertrapp@gmail.com I absolutely agree with Mr Cotter. Idon´t know Debbie personally, but I am sure he knows what he is talking about. I juss miss so much his answer to my recent answers to him. Hope he will find a while in his busy itinerary.. I absolutely agree with Mr Cotter. Idon´t know Debbie personally, but I am sure he knows what he is talking about. I juss miss so much his answer to my recent answers to him. Hope he will find a while in his busy itinerary..

]]> 2012-05-09T;17:14:00-05:00 WPearlman@aol.com Dershowitz was 100% right. And shouldn’t have backed down an inch. Goldstone is a traitor. And there is no denying that. Dershowitz was 100% right. And shouldn’t have backed down an inch. Goldstone is a traitor. And there is no denying that.

]]> 2012-05-09T;17:14:00-05:00 yosefandmelody@gmail.com As opposed to Debra DeLee’s misrepresentation of the Dershowitz case against Goldstone, one can invest some time to decide for oneself with the following: A week and a half ago, (Nov. ‘09)Alan Dershowitz took the stage in a packed auditorium at Fordham Law School in Manhattan. He was supposed to debate Richard Goldstone, the author of the Goldstone Report. But the august international jurist refused, telling the organizers that Dershowitz had “demeaned” him. So Dershowitz stood a copy of the Goldstone Report on the table in the author’s place. The video listed as 93 minutes long, but a great deal of that is Q&A;at the end. The presentation itself takes only 45 minutes. http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/11/dershowitz-for-opposition.html#links As opposed to Debra DeLee’s misrepresentation of the Dershowitz case against Goldstone, one can invest some time to decide for oneself with the following: A week and a half ago, (Nov. ‘09)Alan Dershowitz took the stage in a packed auditorium at Fordham Law School in Manhattan. He was supposed to debate Richard Goldstone, the author of the Goldstone Report. But the august international jurist refused, telling the organizers that Dershowitz had “demeaned” him. So Dershowitz stood a copy of the Goldstone Report on the table in the author’s place.
The video listed as 93 minutes long, but a great deal of that is Q&A;at the end. The presentation itself takes only 45 minutes.
http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2009/11/dershowitz-for-opposition.html#links

]]> 2012-05-09T;17:14:00-05:00 yosefandmelody@gmail.com In truth, Prof. Dershowitz has written dozens of factual refutations of the Goldstone slanders, with a consistent refusal by Goldstone to address the actual topic at hand. It’s Goldstone himself who has raised his being Jewish as a defense against his perverse aid to those whose goal is to put Israel’s population in dangers way, without means of response. “Even before the Goldstone Report was released, Richard Goldstone was arguing for its credibility by invoking his Jewishness, his Zionism, his daughter’s residence in Israel and his connection to Hebrew University. It was the mirror image of the classic fallacy known as the argument ad hominem, which is defined as follows: A substantive argument should not be rejected solely because of who has offered it.” http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2010/02/arguments-ad-hominem-and-by-ethnic.html#links In truth, Prof. Dershowitz has written dozens of factual refutations of the Goldstone slanders, with a consistent refusal by Goldstone to address the actual topic at hand. It’s Goldstone himself who has raised his being Jewish as a defense against his perverse aid to those whose goal is to put Israel’s population in dangers way, without means of response.
“Even before the Goldstone Report was released, Richard Goldstone was arguing for its credibility by invoking his Jewishness, his Zionism, his daughter’s residence in Israel and his connection to Hebrew University. It was the mirror image of the classic fallacy known as the argument ad hominem, which is defined as follows: A substantive argument should not be rejected solely because of who has offered it.”
http://calevbenyefuneh.blogspot.com/2010/02/arguments-ad-hominem-and-by-ethnic.html#links

]]> 2012-05-09T;17:14:00-05:00